Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
Summary: Review Request: <main package name here> - <short summary here> Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wjhns174@hardakers.net QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: The goal of the DNSSEC-Tools project is to create a set of tools, patches, applications, wrappers, extensions, and plugins that will help ease the deployment of DNSSEC-related technologies.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
wjhns174@hardakers.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: <main |Review Request: dnssec-tools |package name here> - <short |- Is a tool set for use with |summary here> |signed DNS zones
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
wjhns174@hardakers.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-04-10 16:34 EST ------- This is a first-time-package and I need a sponsor as well.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
paul@xelerance.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul@xelerance.com
------- Additional Comments From paul@xelerance.com 2007-04-18 17:22 EST -------
I haven't taken on a person for sponsorship yet. I'll talk to Spot about it. But in any case, here is the review. Please let me know when all issues have been fixed and I'll do a new review.
It fails to compile on 64bit:
RPM build errors: File not found: /var/tmp/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1-root-root/usr/lib64/debug/usr/bin/validate.debug File not found: /var/tmp/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1-root-root/usr/lib64/debug/usr/lib64/libsres.so.3.0.0.debug File not found: /var/tmp/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1-root-root/usr/lib64/debug/usr/lib64/libval-threads.so.3.0.0.debug
These seem to get mistakenly installed in /var/tmp/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1-root-root/usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/ instead
I am not sure why you are defining the debug package, since they are built automatically. When your debug package "cut" from the spec file, at the end I get: Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1.src.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-perlmods-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-libs-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-libs-devel-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm Wrote: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/dnssec-tools-debuginfo-1.1.1-1.x86_64.rpm
Second:
perl(Net::DNS::SEC) is needed by dnssec-tools-1.1.1-1.x86_64
It depends ona non-existing package, so this package would have to be added first before Fedora can accept this package
Apart from that:
FIXME: rpmlint warnings: W: dnssec-tools incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1-2 1.1.1-1 W: dnssec-tools-libs no-documentation OK: Package Naming Guidelines followed OK: spec file base name matches base package OK: Packaging Guidelines followed (isn't this a recursive loop anyways :) OK: Package complies to an opensource licence FIX: License states "BSD" but it also includes a requirement to include a disclaimer for the vendor SPARTA. So license should state "BSD-like" OK: %doc includes license file OK: package is in american english OK: spec file is readable. FIX: source field using local reference instead of full URL, eg: Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/%%7Bname%7D/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bver... See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/SourceUrl#head-27442167fe28eb3...
OK: md5sum of source matches that of upstream OK: package compiles into binary rpms (but see note at start or review) OK: all buildrequires listed OK: no bad locale handling FIX: calling ldconfig in %post/%postun in subpackage that installs lib files does not call %post/%postun for sub package libs-devel, which installs files in _libdir. in other words, add: %post libs-devel -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun libs-devel -p /sbin/ldconfig OK: no relocatable
FIX: package creates directories it does not own: /usr/include/validator add it to the %files section Same for /usr/share/dnssec-tools and /etc/dnssec and the perl dirs OK: no duplicate entries in %files OK: every subpackage/package contains %defattr OK: package contains %clean section and rm's buildroot OK: macros used consistently OK: contains contain code, or permissable content. OK: no large documentation files in package OK: %doc items contain no running dependancies OK: includes files are in devel package only OK: no static libs OK: no .pc files without pkconfig OK: .so$ files in devel package OK: devel package requires package (though you could rewrite it to: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} instead of using hardcoded name) OK: *.la files removed correctly OK: no .desktop file requires (no GUI is build) OK: package owns no dir other package owns already OK: install calls rm -rf buildroot OK: filenames are valid UTF-8 OK: scriptlets are sane OK: basic functinality tested and works
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-04-18 20:11 EST ------- Are you by chance using the SRPM available from the dnssec-tools website instead of the one in the comment field above from my submission? Because the one above does *not* build it's own debug package and is much cleaner than the one on the dnssec-tools website (eventually they should become the same, but they're not at the moment). I suspect you've actually grabbed the wrong one? Your other warnings also look like they're from the SRPM on the main dnssec-tools website as they've been corrected in the one at hardakers.net as well.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-04-18 20:14 EST ------- Oh, one more comment: I'm not sure whether the dnssec-tools package has been fully tested on 64bit architectures. I believe it should be ok as that was taken into consideration during development, but...
After installing, run "validate -s" to run a bunch of self-tests and see if they succeeds.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-04-18 20:39 EST ------- New versions of the SRPM and spec file to fix some of the bugs that were not fixed by the original:
Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-2.src.rpm
* Tue Apr 10 2007 Wes Hardaker wjhns174@hardakers.net - 1.1.1-2 - Pointed Source0 at the sourceforge server instead of a local file - Set License to BSD-like - Took ownership of %{_includedir}/validator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-04-18 23:41 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-3.src.rpm
* Wed Apr 18 2007 Wes Hardaker wjhns174@hardakers.net - 1.1.1-3 - Add patch to make Net::DNS::SEC optional - fix date in previous log
This makes the Net::DNS::SEC module optional (needed only for certain functions). Ideally I would like to see that part of FE as well and I'll work on making that spec as well but it starts a long dependency chain of missing FE components (Crypto::OpenSSL::* for one).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From paul@xelerance.com 2007-04-19 00:04 EST ------- I'll check this latest rpm.
Yes, I know the problem of NET::DNS::SEC. That's why I haven't done it either, though I'm requiring it as well. Maybe we should divide the load and tackle them together?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From paul@xelerance.com 2007-04-19 01:54 EST ------- rpmlint found a few things. I still need to go over things manually....
W: dnssec-tools macro-in-%changelog _includedir W: dnssec-tools-libs no-documentation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-04-19 02:34 EST ------- I'll take the macro out of the changelog (it was just documenting something)
The no-documentation error can't go away because there is none!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-04-19 03:07 EST ------- * Wed Apr 18 2007 Wes Hardaker wjhns174@hardakers.net - 1.1.1-4 - Fix changelog so it doesn't have a macro in the documentation - Added a dnsval.conf starting file. - Remove include subdir wildcard expansion since the entire directory is owned.
Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.1.1-4.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
paul@xelerance.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-05-22 19:26 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/dnssec-tools/dnssec-tools-1.2-1.src.rpm
This updates the code to the parent released 1.2 which fixes a number of minor issues here too.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
wjhns174@hardakers.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-05-24 15:04 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools-1.2-1.src.rpm
fix url typos.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From paul@xelerance.com 2007-05-24 16:13 EST ------- Three issues left:
1) There seems to be a missing DESTDIR or buildroot argument, as mock building reveals attempts to install in the real /
make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dnssec-tools-1.2/validator' creating directory /etc/dnssec-tools/ mkdir /etc/dnssec-tools mkdir: cannot create directory `/etc/dnssec-tools': Permission denied creating directory /usr/include/validator/ mkdir /usr/include/validator mkdir: cannot create directory `/usr/include/validator': Permission denied /usr/bin/install -c libval-config /usr/bin /usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file `/usr/bin/libval-config': Permission denied make[1]: *** [localinstall] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/dnssec-tools-1.2/validator' make: *** [subdirinstall] Error 1 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88153 (%install)
RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.88153 (%install)
Error building package from dnssec-tools-1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm, See build log ending done
2) add OPTIMIZE="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the --with-perl-build-args
3) Some cosmetics: -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' +find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';'
Other then that, rpmlint is quiet (apart from dnssec-libs not having a %doc section, which is okay). Let me know when I can try an updated package again.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
paul@xelerance.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |paul@xelerance.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-05-31 19:48 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools-1.2-2.src.rpm
All 3 issues should be fixed!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-07-11 17:47 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools-1.2-3.src.rpm
A couple more clean-ups for newer pecl buildrequires needed...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
wjhns174@hardakers.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-07-11 18:24 EST ------- setting to + as agreed above and over jabber.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
wjhns174@hardakers.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-07-11 18:25 EST ------- ack. wrong package. setting back to ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-07-12 16:08 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.hardakers.net/FE/dnssec-tools-1.2-4.src.rpm
Recent changes in the perl-Net-DNS module caused some problems... This new src rpm contains patches to those.
* Thu Jul 12 2007 Wes Hardaker wjhns174@hardakers.net - 1.2-4 - patch to fix a donuts rule for newer perl-Net::DNS update - patch for maketestzone to work around a bug in Net::DNS::RR::DS
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
paul@xelerance.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From paul@xelerance.com 2007-08-06 23:21 EST ------- OK rpmlint warnings fixed OK license updated OK includes directories it creates (/usr/include/validator) OK missing ldconfig calls added OK source url fixed
OK builds in mock OK rpmlint only gives one warning which may be ignored (dnssec-tools-libs no-documentation)
When trying to install, I still seem to be missing two dependancies (at least in F7):
perl(Net::DNS::SEC) perl(Mail::Send)
I do find perl-Net-DNS-SEC and perl-Mail-Sender in FC6, but not in F7.
Did you forget to request branches and/or fire of a few build requests?
Once these dependancies exist in F7, the package is approved.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-08-08 12:36 EST ------- perl(Net::DNS::SEC) is satisfied by an rpm currently in testing (will be pushed final in a week or so)
perl(Mail::Send) is provided by perl-MailTools so it already exists in the packaging system.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
wjhns174@hardakers.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-08-08 12:41 EST ------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dnssec-tools Short Description: Tools for manipulating and maintaining DNSSEC zones Owners: hardaker Branches: FC-6 F-7 InitialCC: hardaker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2007-08-08 16:58 EST ------- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dnssec-tools - Is a tool set for use with signed DNS zones Alias: dnssec-tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
wjhns174@hardakers.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From wjhns174@hardakers.net 2007-08-09 11:00 EST ------- checked in. thanks!
(make -j4 turned out to be a problem, so there is a new patch in the repo for that)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
--- Comment #24 from Wes Hardaker wjhns174@hardakers.net 2010-07-05 09:12:16 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: dnssec-tools New Branches: EL-5 EL-6 Owners: hardaker
just adding branches
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
Wes Hardaker wjhns174@hardakers.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
--- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2010-07-07 21:11:39 EDT --- CVS done (by process-cvs-requests.py).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235925
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppisar@redhat.com
--- Comment #26 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com 2011-11-16 12:08:23 EST --- dnssec-tools-1.11-1.fc17 contains file validator/libsres/base64.c which starts with:
/* * Copyright (c) 2004 by Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC") * Copyright (c) 1996-1999 by Internet Software Consortium. * * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies. * * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND ISC DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL ISC BE LIABLE FOR * ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT * OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. */
/* * Portions Copyright (c) 1995 by International Business Machines, Inc. * * International Business Machines, Inc. (hereinafter called IBM) grants * permission under its copyrights to use, copy, modify, and distribute this * Software with or without fee, provided that the above copyright notice and * all paragraphs of this notice appear in all copies, and that the name of IBM * not be used in connection with the marketing of any product incorporating * the Software or modifications thereof, without specific, written prior * permission. * * To the extent it has a right to do so, IBM grants an immunity from suit * under its patents, if any, for the use, sale or manufacture of products to * the extent that such products are used for performing Domain Name System * dynamic updates in TCP/IP networks by means of the Software. No immunity is * granted for any product per se or for any other function of any product. * * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", AND IBM DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, * INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A * PARTICULAR PURPOSE. IN NO EVENT SHALL IBM BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, * DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER ARISING * OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN * IF IBM IS APPRISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. */
The first part is ICS license which is O.k. for Fedora, the second is some amendment by IBM which Fedora-suitability is not known to me.
I think these two licenses should be put into package meta-data. (Current is License: BSD.)
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla