Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: emacs-flim - Basic library for handling email messages for Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317
Summary: Review Request: emacs-flim - Basic library for handling email messages for Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: michel+fdr@sylvestre.me QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Story Points: ---
Spec: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/devtools/emacs-flim.spec SRPM: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/devtools/emacs-flim-1.14.9-3.fc15.src.... Description:
FLIM is a library to provide basic features about message representation and encoding for Emacs.
This is a reworking of the original flim package, complying with the new Emacs packaging guidelines. Also, xemacs support has been dropped since emacs-apel, which this depends on, no longer supports it either.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317
Michel Alexandre Salim michel+fdr@sylvestre.me changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+fdr@sylvestre.me 2011-04-04 06:19:29 EDT --- *** Bug 658338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |petersen@redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-04-04 21:53:50 EDT --- Taking this rename review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-05-12 00:42:34 EDT --- Sorry for the long delay, finally had a chance to look at the package.
I think xemacs-w3m still requires flim-xemacs so it would be better to keep xemacs support and rename this package to emacs-common-flim and let xemacs-flim obsolete and provide flim-xemacs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-06-23 21:19:36 EDT --- Another ping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW AssignedTo|petersen@redhat.com |nobody@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317
--- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim michel+fdr@sylvestre.me 2011-07-31 20:44:59 EDT --- Been busy; apologies. Will try and take a look in the next couple of days.
Not sure how xemacs support would work, if flim requires apel and apel no longer supports xemacs -- I'll have to give this some testing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tagoh@redhat.com Status Whiteboard| |notready
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2011-09-02 01:09:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5)
Not sure how xemacs support would work, if flim requires apel and apel no longer supports xemacs -- I'll have to give this some testing.
xemacs-packages-extra provides apel-xemacs at least.
Since flim is only needed by emacs-w3m, I also asked Tagoh-san if he is interested in owning emacs-common-flim.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317
--- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2011-09-02 01:30:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6)
xemacs-packages-extra provides apel-xemacs at least.
That's true. this is why emacs-apel doesn't provide a subpackage for xemacs to avoid the conflict. anyway, that change has been mode some years ago though.
Since flim is only needed by emacs-w3m, I also asked Tagoh-san if he is interested in owning emacs-common-flim.
I don't mind either. I'm not keen to keep the owner of emacs-w3m either, because I rarely use it these days.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org