Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: SFML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
Summary: Review Request: SFML Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bioinfornatics@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
new package for build a GUI in cpp :http://www.sfml-dev.org/index.php
Koji build : F13 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2594059 F14 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2594072 SPEC: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/sfml.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #1 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornatics@gmail.com 2010-11-11 09:06:54 EST --- Update Koji build : F13 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2594890 F14 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2594895 SPEC: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/sfml.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.lehtola@iki.fi 2010-11-12 20:01:31 EST --- The summary should read simply "A simple and fast multimedia library" instead of "SFML is a simple and fast multimedia library"
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #3 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornatics@gmail.com 2010-11-12 23:55:00 EST --- spec update
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: SFML |Review Request: SFML - A | |simple and fast multimedia | |library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
Haïkel Guémar karlthered@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |karlthered@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |karlthered@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Haïkel Guémar karlthered@gmail.com 2010-11-18 15:04:50 EST --- * license field should use standard short name: zlib instead of zlib/libpng. * unversionned shared libraries should go into appropriate devel subpackage * no %post & %postun for shared libraries subpackages * incoherent versionning in changelog: use major.minor.revision scheme ! * main package group should be "Development/Libraries" * any reason not shipping sfml bindings ? at least, you should enable C, Python, Ruby and D ;) * what's the status of sfml 1.6 ? are the two branches parallel installable ? if it's the case, you should consider renaming your package sfml2.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #5 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornatics@gmail.com 2010-11-22 14:24:44 EST --- i can't enable sfml binding in same time for example for CSFML we need have FindSFML.cmake in /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindSFML.cmake. I do not know how said to cmake look this module in %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/cmake/Modules/FindSFML.cmake
cmake search only in /usr/share/cmake/Modules.
SFML 1.6 is unmaintained
For other thing i will fix spec file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #6 from Haïkel Guémar karlthered@gmail.com 2010-11-22 15:34:10 EST ---
cmake search only in /usr/share/cmake/Modules
You can override default search path by using variable CMAKE_MODULE_PATH, you may even reorder search path priorities. That's basic stuff for awesome build systems like CMake.
I see 2 options from there: a) hacking CMake files to enable building bindings, do-able but requires some cmake wizardry. b) regenerate your tarballs without bindings. i'd rather go with option b) and ask SFML maintainer to provide proper sources tarballs when it goes stable. It will simplify both upstream and downstream maintainers lifes.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #7 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornatics@gmail.com 2010-12-28 07:44:02 EST --- i choose b/ update rpm package scratch build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2691167
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #8 from Haïkel Guémar karlthered@gmail.com 2010-12-28 16:11:40 EST --- * devel subpackages should require their non-devel counterpart. * since you use %cmake macro, you don't need to set CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX, CMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR or LIB_INSTALL_DIR (rpm --eval %cmake will tell which options are already enabled). You could probably drop the VERBOSE=1 as we set CMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE. * to improve spec readability, avoid lines longer than 80 columns or any reasonnable limit.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #9 from Tim Niemueller tim@niemueller.de 2011-06-21 14:21:54 EDT --- F-15 requires some trivial fixes to build (NULL undefined, just replace with 0). Would you consider to go on with the review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #10 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornatics@gmail.com 2011-07-29 17:21:23 EDT --- sorry i have miss your message, currently i works on ldc 2 so i think is better wait ldc 2 (D2) is done and after continuing D packaging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
--- Comment #11 from Tim Niemueller tim@niemueller.de 2011-10-12 04:56:49 EDT --- Any progress?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
Julian Sikorski belegdol@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |belegdol@gmail.com See Also| |https://bugzilla.redhat.com | |/show_bug.cgi?id=759059
--- Comment #12 from Julian Sikorski belegdol@gmail.com 2011-12-01 06:06:38 EST --- I have made an SFML-1.6 package and submitted it for review. It is required by the dolphin emulator, which might be then targeted to RPM Fusion.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornatics@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Last Closed| |2011-12-18 18:29:10
--- Comment #13 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornatics@gmail.com 2011-12-18 18:29:10 EST ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 759059 ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org