October 2006 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 187706] Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706 ------- Additional Comments From jima(a)beer.tclug.org 2006-10-03 11:13 EST ------- Just a heads-up, I finished a new SRPM with most (all?) of the fixes rolled in: http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/alsa-oss/alsa-oss.spec http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/alsa-oss/alsa-oss-1.0.12-1.fc6.src.rpm I've also noticed the the original reporter evidently hasn't been seen on Bugzilla since 2006-04-26, has three bugs filed against his packages, and has had his existing packages orphaned. In other words, I think he's gone. :-( *begins twiddling thumbs* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 187706] Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706 ------- Additional Comments From jima(a)beer.tclug.org 2006-10-03 09:40 EST ------- Denis: Thanks for putting a finite expiration date on this review. If no one else is interested, I'll submit a package rolling in corrections from #8 and (hopefully) #9. If someone else is interested...want a co-maintainer? ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From gauret(a)free.fr 2006-10-03 09:30 EST ------- Great news ! As long as it is planned for inclusion in the mainline kernel, I guess it qualifies to be packaged in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From kpfleming(a)digium.com 2006-10-03 09:00 EST ------- I already commented that someone else could do this, that's no surprise to me :-) I did not really consider the option that Linus would let us still be the official maintainers of Zaptel-in-the-kernel and thus we'd be responsible for merging all patches that come through other channels (unless we fail to do that job adequately). Given that, I'll talk to our people here and start the process, since that would allow us to maintain our licensing control where we need to. However, given the current state of the code, I can guarantee that it won't get merged into the mainline kernel tree soon, as it does not currently meet kernel coding guidelines. We'll need to get a kernel driver person working on cleaning up the code and preparing it for submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 187706] Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706 ------- Additional Comments From denis(a)poolshark.org 2006-10-03 08:08 EST ------- This bug will be closed as NOTABUG on 10/07, one week after I contacted the original submitter. People interested should prepare a new SRPM for submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2(a)redhat.com 2006-10-03 04:08 EST ------- If we ship OpenPBX in Fedora then I'm sure its developer base will increase. And where they're using code inherited from Asterisk, can't they just port fixes from Asterisk too? But I really would prefer to ship Asterisk itself. The only reason I'm even considering OpenPBX is because of the _technical_ improvements -- mainly eliminating the _requirement_ for zaptel, and shipping app_conference. Let's go ahead with an Asterisk package without zaptel for now, and then work on getting the rest up to scratch. http://david.woodhou.se/asterisk/asterisk.spec http://david.woodhou.se/asterisk/asterisk-1.2.12.1-1.src.rpm Oh, I took spandsp out of that too -- I'll put it back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 176579] Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ipsvd -- Internet protocol service daemons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176579 ------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2006-10-03 00:37 EST ------- Perhaps this should be moved back to FE-NEW and assigned to nobody(a)fedoraproject.org? Jochen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 178922] Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: asterisk - The Open Source PBX https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178922 ------- Additional Comments From jeff(a)ocjtech.us 2006-10-03 00:26 EST ------- OpenPBX has been due for release soon for a long time now... While OpenPBX has progressed on the fronts that you mention, other parts of the code that were inherited from Asterisk have seen little or no maintenance, while Asterisk has had many security and bug fixes applied. OpenPBX has lofty goals and I applaud what they have done so far... however I fear that there are just too few people working on the OpenPBX code to keep up with security and bug fixes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 188478] Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fxload-2002_04_11.spec https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188478 kevin(a)tummy.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2006-10-03 00:22 EST ------- Sorry, I must have gotten confused somewhere there. Neal is now sponsored tho (in bug #205023). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 177747] Review Request: glade3

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: glade3 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177747 bbbush.yuan(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://ftp.acc.umu.se/pub/GN|ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedo |OME/sources/glade-3/ |ra-cn/fe-review/glade3 ------- Additional Comments From bbbush.yuan(a)gmail.com 2006-10-02 23:09 EST ------- spec and srpm uploaded to ftp for review, which is at ftp://ftp.fedora.cn/pub/fedora-cn/fe-review/glade3 mock build passed, there is something I'm not sure, that is BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser) since I don't know if it is an intltool dependency or glade3's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review October 2006