package-review May 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
1095 discussions

[Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 ------- Additional Comments From dennis(a)ausil.us 2006-05-05 16:43 EST ------- im unable to recreate it i just did a select query on a table returning over 100,000 rows on my x86_64 box -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187569] Review Request: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-mailwatch-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187569 bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list(a)redhat.com |review(a)redhat.com fedora.wickert(a)arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert(a)arcor.de 2006-05-05 15:52 EST ------- Thanks fpr the review, Kevin. Imported and build for FC-4 and FC-5. Rawhide is hosed ATM. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 fedora.wickert(a)arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fedora.wickert(a)arcor.de |bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From fedora.wickert(a)arcor.de 2006-05-05 14:04 EST ------- Sorry it took so long. The good thing about this is that I had enough time to really test your package. Hylafax works prefectly here together with a capi4hylafax package I rolled. Still I don't have a analog modem to test. GOOD: - Source matches upstream now $ md5sum ~/downloads/hylafax-4.3.0.1.tar.gz (from osdn.sf.net) 30f6e56629f6a0ff40846be30a4f4ab8 /home/chris/downloads/hylafax-4.3.0.1.tar.gz $ md5sum ~/Desktop/hylafax-4.3.0.1.tar.gz (from SRPM) 30f6e56629f6a0ff40846be30a4f4ab8 /home/chris/Desktop/hylafax-4.3.0.1.tar.gz - License field ok - explicit dependency on libtiff removed BAD: - still can't build this on my Core 5 machine, only mock succeeds. pkg-config still looks in /usr/local/.. - rpmlint errors in detail: RPM (build in mock from your srpm): $ rpmlint hylafax-4.3.0.1-1.fc5.i386.rpm | sort E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.daily/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/cron.hourly/hylafax E: hylafax executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/hylafax safe to ignore E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so.4.3.0.1 libfaxserver.so E: hylafax invalid-soname /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so.4.3.0.1 libfaxutil.so ok for me, I don't see a reason for changing this and for splitting out 2 symlinks into a seperate devel-package. E: hylafax non-executable-script /var/spool/hylafax/bin/notify.awk 0444 is this on purpose? If not fix it upstream. ok then E: hylafax non-readable /var/spool/hylafax/etc/hosts.hfaxd 0600 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/archive 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/docq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/doneq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/pollq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/sendq 0700 E: hylafax non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/hylafax/tmp 0700 due to ownership of uucp, safe to ignore. Nevertheless I suggest the other dirs in /var/spool/hylafax to be owned by root. E: hylafax script-without-shellbang /usr/sbin/faxsetup.linux ignore or fix upstream W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxserver.so W: hylafax devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libfaxutil.so still no reason for a sepate -devel package IMO W: hylafax incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.2.5.6-1 4.3.0.1-1.fc5 make sure the version field and changelog are matching. Please insert a blank line after every changelog entry. ;) W: hylafax non-conffile-in-etc /etc/hylafax/faxcover_example_sgi.ps safe to ignore, otherwise mark this file as %config SRPM: rpmlint ../hylafax-4.3.0.1-1.src.rpm E: hylafax no-%clean-section IMHO you should replace [ "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" != "/" ] && rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with a simple rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Your version is safer for other systems but this is a fedora package after all. Anyway: I realized I'm not allowed to review your package. You are a first timer, I'm not a sponsor. "The primary Reviewer can be any current package owner, unless the Contributor is a first timer." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#head-e1a114b234997… So I have added the review to the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tracker. You will have to wait fore someone to sponsor you. Sorry, there's nothing I can do for you ATM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-05-05 10:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #13) > > So perhaps it's gtkglext-1.0.pc or gdkglext-x11-1.0.pc that should require > > pangoft2 or pangoxft? > Hmm, does anybody see any direct dependency between gtkglext and pangoft2 or > pangoxft? > > At least, I don't see any, so I am inclined to think there might be a missing > dep anywhere underneath. Or am I missing something? As it happens, I think Gérard has done exactly the right thing. This package is explicitly calling for ft2 support by including pango/pangoft2.h from glgd.h. This only happens if the --enable-glgd-pango option is passed to the configure script, and HAVE_GLGD_PANGO gets set. So it's this client, and not a problem stemming from a missing dep somewhere down the tree. If there's a bug, I suggest that it's that --enable-glgd-pango in this package should also pull in the pangoft2 pkgconfig file for include directory settings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 169704] Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704 ------- Additional Comments From gemi(a)bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 09:59 EST ------- Next try: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/mosml-2.01-8.fc5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

1 0

[Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

1 0

[Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

1 0

[Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-05-05 09:01 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > However, this means, that there is a bug in the pkg-config for > pango: it returns only -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include, but since the pango header file > pangofc-font.h includes ft2build.h, the include path for freetype > must be added too. I thought it would be something along those lines but was a bit confused by the fact that pango-devel includes five .pc files, and the pangoft2.pc and pangoxft.pc files do have the necessary include path. So perhaps it's gtkglext-1.0.pc or gdkglext-x11-1.0.pc that should require pangoft2 or pangoxft? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 May '06

05 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 ------- Additional Comments From gemi(a)bluewin.ch 2006-05-05 08:51 EST ------- Mea culpa! On my system I had linked /usr/include/freetype2 to /usr/include/freetype. When I removed the link, the build doesn't work anymore. So I defined CFLAGS to use the freetype pkg-config flags in the spec file. Now it builds in mock too. However, this means, that there is a bug in the pkg-config for pango: it returns only -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include, but since the pango header file pangofc-font.h includes ft2build.h, the include path for freetype must be added too. Updated package: http://math.ifi.unizh.ch/fedora/5/i386/SRPMS.gemi/gauche-gtk-0.4.1-7.fc5.sr… -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review May 2006