package-review May 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
1095 discussions

[Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '06

01 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2006-05-01 04:27 EST ------- I am importing the package now. Should I remove the /usr/share/applnk/kchmviewer.desktop file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188369] Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '06

01 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ctapi-cyberjack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188369 ------- Additional Comments From frank-buettner(a)gmx.net 2006-05-01 04:08 EST ------- So I am working again:) And what is ctapi-cyberjack devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libctapi-cyberjack.so?? It is an simble lib and no static oder header file. So why it is called an devel file?? But I can not find the pronlem for the "E: ctapi-cyberjack library-not-linked-against-libc" ldd say's this is linked again libc:( ldd /usr/lib/libctapi-cyberjack.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00d37000) /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 (0x007b6000) libusb-0.1.so.4 => /usr/lib/libusb-0.1.so.4 (0x0091e000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x007c2000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00d38000) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 189725] New: Review Request: ifolder3-server
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 May '06

01 May '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189725 Summary: Review Request: ifolder3-server Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info ReportedBy: michael(a)knox.net.nz QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/iFolder3/ifolder3-server.spec SRPM URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/fedora_extras/iFolder3/ifolder3-server-3.5.6108.1-1.… Description: The iFolder-server provides a server for Personal Backup, File access any time and any where, and document based collaboration. iFolder allows users to create iFolders on their client machines and sync the contents of those files to the server as a backup. iFolders can also be shared with other iFolder users defined in the server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 4

[Bug 185262] Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Apr '06

30 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kchmviewer - CHM viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185262 bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list(a)redhat.com |review(a)redhat.com jpmahowald(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info |jpmahowald(a)gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald(a)gmail.com 2006-04-30 22:09 EST ------- rpmlint checks return: E: kchmviewer old-menu-entry /usr/share/applnk/kchmviewer.desktop Not necessary with it already in /usr/share/applications - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop file ok %description's a bit long, but oh well. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 166470] Review Request: taskjuggler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 30 Apr '06

30 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: taskjuggler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166470 ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald(a)gmail.com 2006-04-30 21:20 EST ------- E: taskjuggler binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/TaskJugglerUI ['/usr/lib64', '/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/lib'] Try configure --disable-rpath W: taskjuggler devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so It's a symlink, no big deal E: taskjuggler zero-length /usr/share/apps/taskjuggler/templates/en_US/Blank_File.tji Ignore. E: taskjuggler library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so.3.0.3 E: taskjuggler library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libtaskjuggler.so.3.0.3 * Missing SMP flags. If it doesn't build with it, please add a comment (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#parallelmake) * No downloadable source. Please give the full URL in the Source tag. .desktop file needs some work, use desktop-file-install * Desktop file: vendor should be fedora (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * Scriptlets: missing update-desktop-database (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain X-Fedora (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * Desktop file: the Categories tag should contain Application (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#desktop) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %post (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) * Scriptlets: missing "gtk-update-icon-cache" in %postun (wiki: ScriptletSnippets) The /usr/share/doc/HTML conflicts with Fedora's stuff, this and probably the contents of packages/taskjuggler should be flagged with %doc instead. Any way to remove the .la file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review May 2006