package-review June 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
1071 discussions

[Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-06-03 19:10 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop-0.11-5.src.rpm Point #41 addressed - however, it's not as cleanly as I'd like. Not sure if it's a bug in desktop-file-install or just me, but I've had to manually removed monodevelop.desktop from %datadir/applications using rm -f. It does the same job, but it's not as nice -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

1 0

[Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

1 0

[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: nagios-plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176374 ------- Additional Comments From jpo(a)di.uminho.pt 2006-06-03 18:12 EST ------- Mike, As in this review there are several people envolved, we should fall back to a voting decision (as in old Fedora.us days). At least two or three other reviewers should express their opinion by placing a comment like PUBLISH++ or PUBLISH--. But if no one expresses his opinion, lets say in the next 48 hours, I will approve this package changing the blocking ticket from FE-REVIEW to FE-ACCEPT. (I still would love to see a comment from someone with a 64bit system.) My vote is for approval. PUBLISH++ MD5SUMS: 6387568f71b4c7fd6afe62afdb5e1972 nagios-plugins-1.4.3-5.src.rpm 2c40fc69d51cc979e85150870a1daa93 nagios-plugins-1.4.3.tar.gz 6af2d874922483154a5e8adf87e066b3 nagios-plugins.spec jpo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 176374] Review Request: nagios-plugins
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

1 0

[Bug 181599] Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gallery2: web based photo album software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181599 ------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2006-06-03 16:21 EST ------- Re comment #61: Yeah, that was the problem. It was defaulting to /srv/gallery2 instead of the data dir that I gave it. This must be a bug in the installer... ;( Multi-site is working here if I go to that step and manually edit the config.php to put in the right path. So, outstanding issues I see: - Making a README.fedora would be nice (but not required). - There was some talk at a recent FESCo meeting about requiring web apps to install in /usr/share/$name instead of /var/www/$name, but I don't see any hard requirement on it currently, and I don't think the selinux stuff is in place for that currently either. I want to do a final rebuild/rpmlint/sanity check here before approval. If anyone else sees any blockers, speak up now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 166919] Review Request: findlib
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: findlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166919 ------- Additional Comments From gemi(a)bluewin.ch 2006-06-03 15:20 EST ------- I completely forgot about this, sorry! The URLs are broken, can you provide new ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From bdpepple(a)ameritech.net 2006-06-03 12:38 EST ------- You need to remove the duplicate desktop file. Add the '--delete-original' to your desktop-file-install line, and remove the '%{_datadir}/applications/monodevelop.desktop' from the file section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 178904] Review Request: Monodevelop
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-06-03 12:01 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/monodevelop-0.11-4.src.rpm All of points #36 and #37 are addressed in this build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 171915] Review Request: texmaker - LaTeX editor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Jun '06

03 Jun '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texmaker - LaTeX editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171915 fedora.wickert(a)arcor.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list(a)redhat.com |review(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review June 2006