Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904
------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-06-03 10:45 EST -------
Okay, I've sorted #36 and #37 for the most part, except I'm not sure how to
handle the desktop file and for the LOCALES, am I okay to just have
%{_datadir}/locale/*
or would that cause problems?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple(a)ameritech.net 2006-06-03 10:25 EST -------
Also, don't add filesystem as a Requirement. Comment #33 was incorrect in
suggesting this, since the error was due to your handling of directories in the
%file section
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple(a)ameritech.net 2006-06-03 10:19 EST -------
Couple of quick items:
1. Dekstop file is not handled correctly.
2. Locals are no handled correctly.
3. In the files section to simplify it, why don't you use
'%{_datadir}/mime/application/*.xml'? This would be much easier than listing
each file.
4. Don't package the generic INSTALL file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: man-pages-uk - Ukrainian man pages from Linux Documentation Project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182415
------- Additional Comments From andy(a)smile.org.ua 2006-06-03 08:35 EST -------
What the manuals are non-utf8 exactly? I review all manuals in tarball and find
nothing non-utf mans.
I've catched the package version from a VERSION Makefile's variable. Is it not
correct?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904
------- Additional Comments From bdpepple(a)ameritech.net 2006-06-03 08:08 EST -------
(In reply to comment #33)
> It seems this package owns some directories already owned by shared-mime-info,
> as well as some other directories onto /usr/share/mime.
>
This is due to problems in the %files section of the spec file (in particular
the '%{_datadir}/*'). This seems to be a constant problem, which I've noticed
with other packages I've reviewed for Paul.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Monodevelop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178904
fedora(a)iagorubio.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora(a)iagorubio.com
------- Additional Comments From fedora(a)iagorubio.com 2006-06-03 07:58 EST -------
It seems this package owns some directories already owned by shared-mime-info,
as well as some other directories onto /usr/share/mime.
[iago@puhisher share]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/mime
shared-mime-info-0.17-1.fc5.1
monodevelop-0.11-2
[iago@puhisher share]$ rpm -qf /usr/share/mime/packages
shared-mime-info-0.17-1.fc5.1
monodevelop-0.11-2
[iago@puhisher share]$ rpm -ql monodevelop | grep mime | grep -v .xml$
/usr/share/mime
/usr/share/mime/XMLnamespaces
/usr/share/mime/aliases
/usr/share/mime/application
/usr/share/mime/globs
/usr/share/mime/magic
/usr/share/mime/mime.cache
/usr/share/mime/packages
/usr/share/mime/subclasses
/usr/share/mime/
May be it's worth to fix it now to avoid the case of /usr/share/applications.
[iago@puhisher share]$ rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/applications
gnome-media-2.14.0-2
bug-buddy-2.14.0-1
glade2-2.12.1-2
gnome-utils-2.14.0-4.fc5.1
nautilus-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
openoffice.org-calc-2.0.2-5.12.2
gthumb-2.7.5.1-1.fc5.1
openoffice.org-impress-2.0.2-5.12.2
eog-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
file-roller-2.14.2-1.fc5.1
gnome-system-monitor-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
gedit-2.14.2-1.fc5.1
openoffice.org-draw-2.0.2-5.12.2
openoffice.org-writer-2.0.2-5.12.2
gnome-session-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
openoffice.org-math-2.0.2-5.12.2
gdm-2.14.4-1.fc5.1
gnome-terminal-2.14.1-1.fc5.1
gnome-games-2.14.1-1.fc5.3
gftp-2.0.18-3.2.1
filesystem-2.3.7-1.2.1
monodevelop-0.11-2
I think all those packages should require filesystem to avoid this mess up - or
require nothing explicitly, assuming filesystem is already installed.
Otherwise the monodevelop package looks and works fine here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: elektra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187430
------- Additional Comments From pertusus(a)free.fr 2006-06-03 07:15 EST -------
(In reply to comment #33)
There is still an issue, with kdb dlopening libelektratools. Indeed,
libelektratools.so is in elektra-devel, so kdb cannot dlopen
libelektratool. For example at install time
[root@patoune ~]# rpm -Uvh /home/dumas/RPM-fc/RPMS/i386/elektra-0.6.2-1.i386.rpm
Préparation... ########################################### [100%]
1:elektra ########################################### [100%]
kdbLibLoad : libelektratools.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directorykdb: XML importing and editing disabled
kdbLibLoad : libelektratools.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
directorykdb: XML importing and editing disabled
> How and where to ask for a sponsor ?
First of all make that bug block FE-NEEDSPONSOR
Ask on the fedora-extras-list for a sponsor pointing out your
comments on other people package reviews, participate in the
discussions on the fedora extras mailing lists, subscribe to the
cvs commit extras mailing list, watch the changes for the packages
you are interested in and comment on them when you have something to
say, submit bug reports when you have found limitations in other
people packages.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.