package-review July 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
877 discussions

[Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jul '06

09 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 Bug 182320 depends on bug 182319, which changed state. Bug 182319 Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Jul '06

09 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 fedora(a)adslpipe.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fedora(a)adslpipe.co.uk |bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 197736] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197736 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info ReportedBy: steve(a)silug.org QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime/perl-Date… SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.0700-1.… Description: This module implements most of strptime(3), the POSIX function that is the reverse of strftime(3), for DateTime. While strftime takes a DateTime and a pattern and returns a string, strptime takes a string and a pattern and returns the DateTime object associated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 4

[Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 Bug 182320 depends on bug 182319, which changed state. Bug 182319 Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Status|CLOSED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

1 0

[Bug 182319] Review Request: anjuta-gdl
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319 ------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael(a)gmx.net 2006-07-08 08:11 EST ------- * Missing -devel package dependencies! Notice the "Requires" line in the pkgconfig file. You have a broken pkgconfig dependency chain there. The C headers also include missing headers. Add the required -devel packages as dependencies of your anjuta-gdl-devel package. * Prefer "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} in your -devel package, so main package and -devel package are in sync as much as possible. > post/postun ldconfig ok When there's no scriptlet body, prefer: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig That adds automatic dependencies on /sbin/ldconfig, too. Else, add the missing dependencies manually: Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz(a)informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-07-08 05:38 EST ------- regarding comment #22 (sorry, I forget it) ------------------------------------------ > >- renamed the current main-package into a '-core' subpackage and > > created a new main-package which requires both the 'tor-core' > > subpackage and this with the current default init-method. This > > allows 'yum install tor' to work better; because yum is not very > > smart, the old packaging might install unwanted packages else. > > Humm.. Can you elobrate on what situation would result in unwanted > packages? We had the following situation with the old packaging: | Name: tor | Requires: init(tor) | | %package lsb | Provides: init(tor) = lsb | Requires: lsb | | %package initng | Provides: init(tor) = initng | Requires: initng Assuming you have a minimal system with the 'initng' initsystem but without 'tor' packages. Now When you install 'tor' now, two possibilities exist for the resulting package combination : * 'tor' + 'tor-initng'; this is the probably wanted result and will not bring unwanted packages in * 'tor' + 'tor-lsb'; this will install 'tor-lsb' (which will not work with the initng system) with its huge dependency chain. This option is probably unwanted. yum has a lousy depsolver and will use the second, unwanted option due to the shortest-packagename-wins rule. Therefore, I moved 'tor' into the -core subpackage and made 'tor' a metapackage requiring 'tor-core' plus the subpackage for the current initsystem. This might be tor-lsb for FC4-FC6 and tor-initng for FC7. This eases package installation for people with standard installation doing | # yum install tor and those with initng who can do | # yum install tor-core tor-initng -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

1 0

← Newer
1
...
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
...
88
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review July 2006