Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnome-build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320
Bug 182320 depends on bug 182319, which changed state.
Bug 182319 Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Status|NEW |CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319
paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758
fedora(a)adslpipe.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|fedora(a)adslpipe.co.uk |bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197736
Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info
ReportedBy: steve(a)silug.org
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime/perl-Date…
SRPM URL: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.0700-1.…
Description:
This module implements most of strptime(3), the POSIX function that is the
reverse of strftime(3), for DateTime. While strftime takes a DateTime and a
pattern and returns a string, strptime takes a string and a pattern and
returns the DateTime object associated.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnome-build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320
Bug 182320 depends on bug 182319, which changed state.
Bug 182319 Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319
What |Old Value |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |
Status|CLOSED |NEW
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319
paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|CLOSED |NEW
Keywords| |Reopened
Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319
------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-08 12:33 EST -------
#10, thanks. I'll get that fixed tonight and it should be out for the next push
(probably Sunday)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: anjuta-gdl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182319
------- Additional Comments From bugs.michael(a)gmx.net 2006-07-08 08:11 EST -------
* Missing -devel package dependencies! Notice the "Requires" line
in the pkgconfig file. You have a broken pkgconfig dependency chain
there. The C headers also include missing headers. Add the required
-devel packages as dependencies of your anjuta-gdl-devel package.
* Prefer "Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} in your -devel
package, so main package and -devel package are in sync as much as
possible.
> post/postun ldconfig ok
When there's no scriptlet body, prefer:
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
That adds automatic dependencies on /sbin/ldconfig, too.
Else, add the missing dependencies manually:
Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175433
------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz(a)informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-07-08 05:38 EST -------
regarding comment #22 (sorry, I forget it)
------------------------------------------
> >- renamed the current main-package into a '-core' subpackage and
> > created a new main-package which requires both the 'tor-core'
> > subpackage and this with the current default init-method. This
> > allows 'yum install tor' to work better; because yum is not very
> > smart, the old packaging might install unwanted packages else.
>
> Humm.. Can you elobrate on what situation would result in unwanted
> packages?
We had the following situation with the old packaging:
| Name: tor
| Requires: init(tor)
|
| %package lsb
| Provides: init(tor) = lsb
| Requires: lsb
|
| %package initng
| Provides: init(tor) = initng
| Requires: initng
Assuming you have a minimal system with the 'initng' initsystem but
without 'tor' packages. Now
When you install 'tor' now, two possibilities exist for the resulting
package combination :
* 'tor' + 'tor-initng'; this is the probably wanted result and will
not bring unwanted packages in
* 'tor' + 'tor-lsb'; this will install 'tor-lsb' (which will not work
with the initng system) with its huge dependency chain. This option
is probably unwanted.
yum has a lousy depsolver and will use the second, unwanted option due
to the shortest-packagename-wins rule.
Therefore, I moved 'tor' into the -core subpackage and made 'tor' a
metapackage requiring 'tor-core' plus the subpackage for the current
initsystem. This might be tor-lsb for FC4-FC6 and tor-initng for FC7.
This eases package installation for people with standard installation
doing
| # yum install tor
and those with initng who can do
| # yum install tor-core tor-initng
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.