package-review July 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
877 discussions

[Bug 180571] Review Request: puppet
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: puppet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180571 jpmahowald(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info |jpmahowald(a)gmail.com OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald(a)gmail.com 2006-07-08 00:03 EST ------- Built against 1.3.3-1 facter. rpmlint is noisy. E: puppet zero-length /usr/share/doc/puppet-0.18.2/examples/root/etc/configfile E: puppet zero-length /usr/share/doc/puppet-0.18.2/examples/root/etc/otherfile Ignore. E: puppet non-standard-uid /var/lib/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-gid /var/lib/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-uid /var/log/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-gid /var/log/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-uid /var/run/puppet puppet E: puppet non-standard-gid /var/run/puppet puppet The user/group was added. Ignore. W: puppet doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/puppet-0.18.2/examples/root/bin/sleeper /usr/bin/ruby Required for puppet, ok. E: puppet incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/puppet puppet} W: puppet mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Cosmetic. W: puppet-server no-documentation Fine. W: puppet-server incoherent-init-script-name puppetmaster Not puppet, ok. Defines %ruby_sitelibdir as per guidlines. - license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR Do you need both of: Requires: ruby >= 1.8.1 and Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 ? Merely redundant if so. - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 182320] Review Request: gnome-build
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-07 20:09 EST ------- Spec Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/gnome-build-0.1.3-3.src.rpm Various rpmlint fixes Builds in i386 mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187913] Review Request: mysql-query-browser
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mysql-query-browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187913 dennis(a)ausil.us changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |197881 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 175623] Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: yaz - Z39.50/SRW/SRU programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175623 icon(a)fedoraproject.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From icon(a)fedoraproject.org 2006-07-07 17:50 EST ------- Just lack of attention. :) Closing, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 176253] Review Request: clement-2.1
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: clement-2.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176253 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl 2006-07-07 16:33 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Version 2.1-175 SPECS file is now clean according rpmlint-0.77-1.fc5 > rpmbuild give no warning anymore about "File listed twice" > Good, whats with the release tag inflation (very high number)? > Spec Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SPECS/clement-2.1-175.spec > SRPM Url: ftp://ftp.safe.ca/pub/clement-2.1/SRPMS/clement-2.1-175.src.rpm > > Numerous bug-fix/improvement have been done since last bugzilla Clement > update (2.1-99), see the Changes file and SPEC Changelog for details. > > According to me SPEC file is really better, Yes it is, its becoming readable, with the proper order and stuff, it almost looks like a real specfile now :) there 2 issue not yet addressed: > 1) /var/lib/clement-2.1 contents. > those file are mainly day to day clement own management, I am really > reluctant to put them in /usr/bin as they are for the sole clement purpose. > what is the best option in such case? You could & should put them under /usr/lib/clement (%{_libdir}/%{name}) really) > 2) ownership for /var/www/clement-2.1: > putting everything own by 'mail' is may be overkilling, this web part is not > meaningful if clement daemon is not up and running, Clement itself run with > uid 'mail', that why I chose to set the ownership as 'mail'. > I think a default of root root as normal would be better, with an exception for files and or dir which clement needs to write. Also I recently learned that web application packages should not touch /var/www as they might accidently overwrite user content put there, instead the should install their files under /usr/share/%{name}, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-5d1681fa7cf3714ad49… Besides that things are looking good, accept for the: #----------------------------------------------------------- #Clement SPEC definition #----------------------------------------------------------- comment, please remove that. Let me know when you've a new version with these issues fixed. p.s. I'm going on a short vacation from Monday 10 juli till Friday 14 juli, so if I'm quiet for a while thats why. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197974 | OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 181445] Review Request: php-shout
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-shout https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181445 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|181523 | OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197974 | OtherBugsDependingO| |197974 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-07-07 15:38 EST ------- Trying to get FE-GUIDELINES blockers right; sorry for the spam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 176712] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-gcc-newlib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176712 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 176697] Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: i386-rtems4.7-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176697 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197974 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
...
88
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review July 2006