package-review July 2007

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
2522 discussions

[Bug 243664] New: Review Request: innotop - Console MySQL Monitor
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '07

01 Jul '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243664 Summary: Review Request: innotop - Console MySQL Monitor Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfleming+rpm(a)enlartenment.com QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/fedorasubs/innotop.spec SRPM URL: http://www.thatfleminggent.com/fedorasubs/innotop-1.4.2-1.fc7.mf.src.rpm Description: innotop connects to a MySQL database server and retrieves information from it, then displays it in a manner similar to the UNIX top program. innotop uses the data from SHOW VARIABLES, SHOW GLOBAL STATUS, SHOW FULL PROCESSLIST, and SHOW ENGINE INNODB STATUS, among other things. (Note: Taken directly from my own repo, will clean up dist and changelog as needed ;-)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 10

[Bug 188542] Review Request: hylafax
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Jul '07

01 Jul '07

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hylafax https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188542 fedora(a)christoph-wickert.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From fedora(a)christoph-wickert.de 2007-06-30 22:12 EST ------- (In reply to comment #45) > > Christoph: Are you still interested in reviewing this? Yes, but this really is a hard one, especially as there is confusion (about the name) and regressions. As I said before, the 2 latest packages don't work at all because of the not executable files. (In reply to comment #46) > Getting packages into Fedora Extras seems quite impossible :-) Lee, I'm very sorry about that, of course this is partly my fault. On the other hand: The binary package you gave me in comment #40 simply doesn't work and I don't think this is because of machine but of the package itself. I promise (once again) to look at this more deeply tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review July 2007