Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457547
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
|mediascrapper - A script to |mediascrapper - A script to
|scrap media files from |scrap media files from
|different sites |different sites
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-08-04 06:31:40 EDT ---
will you please tell me how can I test package? any sample movie.txt you would
like to provide here?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457232
_pjp_ <pj.pandit(a)yahoo.co.in> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2008-08-04 04:39:43 EDT ---
Thank you.
If you think that this package can be approved, would you set fedora-review
flag to +
and write on this bug that you approved this review request?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454011
Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Customer Facing| |---
--- Comment #9 from Marcela Maslanova <mmaslano(a)redhat.com> 2008-08-04 04:18:44 EDT ---
I don't know why, but it's still can't be built in koji
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=756612&name=build.log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062
--- Comment #2 from _pjp_ <pj.pandit(a)yahoo.co.in> 2008-08-04 04:14:44 EDT ---
Hello Mamoru,
Looks good to me. The build/install from source and rpm did work without any
hassles.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457535
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |panemade(a)gmail.com
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |panemade(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-08-04 03:46:21 EDT ---
1)Correct source url to
Source0: http://www.myanmarnlp.net.mm/downloads/%{archivename}.zip
2) Version should be 3.00. I used "gnome-font-viewer mm3.ttf" command to find
version for font.
3)Correct Changelog entry to
* Fri Aug 01 2008 Minto Joseph <mvaliyav at redhat.com> - 3.00-1
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457509
--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2008-08-04 03:21:16 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=756505
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
caa84f54fedf4fe1bcf50dfe69ec112d scim-thai-0.1.1.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Package scim-thai-0.1.1-2.fc10 =>
Provides: thai-imengine-setup.so thai.so
Requires: libatk-1.0.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libcairo.so.2
libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libgcc_s.so.1 libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libgio-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libm.so.6
libpango-1.0.so.0 libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 libscim-1.0.so.8
libscim-1.0.so.8(LIBSCIM_1.0) libscim-gtkutils-1.0.so.8 libstdc++.so.6
libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) libthai.so.0
rtld(GNU_HASH)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.