package-review February 2009

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
2292 discussions

[Bug 225999] New: Merge Review: libdrm
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Feb '09

01 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225999 Summary: Merge Review: libdrm Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com CC: ajackson(a)redhat.com Fedora Merge Review: libdrm http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/libdrm/ Initial Owner: ajackson(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 12

[Bug 478007] New: Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run
by Red Hat Bugzilla 01 Feb '09

01 Feb '09

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 Summary: Review Request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements… SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requirements… Description: Use this package to install the packages required to run vmware locally. This package does not include the free vmware-server or vmware-server-console package itself. They can be obtained from the vmware website. rpmlint is not clean: vmware-requirements.src:45: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 vmware-requirements.src:47: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXtst.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 vmware-requirements.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary vmware-requirements-server.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel vmware-requirements-server-console.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. Notes: 1. Is there a way in an x86_64 .spec require an eg gtk2.i386 package, without resorting to named file path Requires ? 2. I can make some small readme files to satisfy the no-documentation warnings 3. No binary is correct. The top level package pulls in the 2x sub packages, for the case where you want to run the vmware-server-console on the same machine as the vmware-server. 4. This does not require the VMware's non-open source vmware-server rpms. It only provides an easy way to get prerequisite packages installed so that vmware-server package can run, which saves a lot of messing around. 5. Is it worth changing the name to vmware-prerequisites: $ su -c 'yum install vmware-prerequisites' might be clearer ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 23

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review February 2009