https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380
--- Comment #30 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> ---
Still looking for the aforementioned documentation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046124
Bug ID: 1046124
Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-lexer - Base library for
a lexer that can be used in top-down, recursive
descent parsers
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: shawn.iwinski(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
https://raw.github.com/siwinski/rpms/58afbf34df09331c037ce42a9f83d089708ec0…
SRPM URL:
http://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-doctrine-lexer-1.0-1.20131220git…
Description:
Base library for a lexer that can be used in top-down, recursive descent
parsers.
This lexer is used in Doctrine Annotations and in Doctrine ORM (DQL).
Fedora Account System Username: siwinski
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380
Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> ---
(resetting fedora-cvs flag)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380
--- Comment #28 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> ---
Much of what was discussed here is covered on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Questions_specific_to_existing_Fedor…
In particular, in your original request, you didn't explicitly mention *why*
you were becoming the el6 branch maintainer (as opposed to letting existing
maintainers do it).
Though, this use-case, of someone new/different maintaining a epel-6 branch
separately, could benefit from being listed as a scenario in the aforementioned
link, to help reduce possible confusion.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380
--- Comment #27 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> ---
You got permission, yes, good. The only problem was that the permission was
not verifiable or documented anywhere.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380
--- Comment #26 from Dave Johansen <davejohansen(a)gmail.com> ---
Ok, that makes sense. Could whatever that documentation process needs to be
please be added to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Re…
because those instructions are all that people like me have to go by and it
didn't say anything about how to document that "existing maintainers condone
the branching", so I just assumed that getting permission and then CCing the
owner here was good enough.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380
--- Comment #25 from Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> ---
Dave, thanks for your efforts.
cvs-admins are just doing their due-diligence to ensure other existing
maintainers condone the branching (which was not yet documented, here or
otherwise). It is now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047762
Bug ID: 1047762
Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rugged - Ruby binding to
libgit2
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://ktdreyer.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rugged.spec
SRPM URL:
Description: Rugged is a Ruby bindings to the libgit2 linkable C Git library.
This is for testing and using the libgit2 library in a language that is
awesome.
Fedora Account System Username: ktdreyer
F21 scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6347734
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380
Dave Johansen <dlj(a)rincon.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dlj(a)rincon.com
--- Comment #24 from Dave Johansen <dlj(a)rincon.com> ---
I have modified the .spec file for qt-creator 1.3 to build against the Qt 4
that comes with EL6. Also, I have built qt-creator 3.0 against the Qt 5 that
was recently added to the EPEL and I'm working on finishing up the .spec file
for that.
My plan was to release the 1.3 build for the time being and then update it to
3.0 once I had that .spec file finished. I didn't go over the details of the
plan, but I asked itamarjp if it was ok if I opened a branch for EL6 and he
said that it was. I'm asking to be the owner/maintainer of this and I'm not
asking someone else to do any of the work, so I don't get why there's so much
hesitation/resistance to this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048045
Bug ID: 1048045
Summary: Review Request: python-sphinx-theme-better - A Better
Sphinx Theme
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: manisandro(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-sphinx-theme-better.spec
SRPM URL:
http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-sphinx-theme-better-0.1.5-1.fc2…
Description: A Better Sphinx Theme
Fedora Account System Username: smani
Note: I included the with_python3 conditionals since python-pillow needs this
package and python-pillow is in RHEL7 where python3 is not included.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component