https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119081
Bug ID: 1119081
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp4 -
Pre-Processor-Pretty-Printer for OCaml
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: rjones(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/camlp4/ocaml-camlp4.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/camlp4/ocaml-camlp4-4.02.0-0.1.git87c6a6b…
Description:
camlp4 is a pre-processor and pretty printed for OCaml.
Prior to OCaml 4.02 it was part of the compiler, and indeed it
has been included in Fedora for aeons. However it has now moved
into a separate upstream project (albeit run by exactly the same
people) so it seems better to have a separate Fedora package as
well.
NOTES:
- There are no tarballs yet, but it is expected there will be
upstream releases when OCaml 4.02.0 is out of beta.
- You will only be able to build this against OCaml 4.02 from Rawhide.
It is not buildable against earlier versions of OCaml.
Fedora Account System Username: rjones
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122073
Bug ID: 1122073
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-labltk - Tcl/Tk interface for
OCaml
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: rjones(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/labltk/ocaml-labltk.spec
SRPM URL:
http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/labltk/ocaml-labltk-4.02-0.1.beta1.fc20.s…
Description: Tcl/Tk interface for OCaml
Fedora Account System Username: rjones
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1028818
Bug ID: 1028818
Summary: Review Request: python-pyplete - Dynamic
autocompletion for Python
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: tchollingsworth(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: notting(a)redhat.com,
package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec: http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pyplete.spec
SRPM:
http://patches.fedorapeople.org/kate-pate/python-pyplete-0.0.5-1.fc20.src.r…
Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6163424
FAS: patches
Description:
PyPlete provides dynamic autocompletion for Python. It uses pysmell but
unlike the standard version of it, PyPlete is dynamic, it does not need to
execute a command to pre-analyze the code. It is useful for analyzing (or
autocompleting) Python code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492325
Jared Smith <jsmith.fedora(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith <jsmith.fedora(a)gmail.com> ---
'Requested package in ticket
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/1233'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1492325
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |POST
CC| |zebob.m(a)gmail.com
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
Everything is okay, package accepted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481875
Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |zebob.m(a)gmail.com
Flags| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin <zebob.m(a)gmail.com> ---
Everything is okay but you should query upstream for a license file.
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
===== MUST items =====
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 18 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-pytest-
virtualenv/review-python-pytest-virtualenv/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.6/site-
packages/__pycache__(python3-cycler, python3-sh, python3-libs)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2
-pytest-virtualenv , python3-pytest-virtualenv
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: python2-pytest-virtualenv-1.2.11-2.fc28.noarch.rpm
python3-pytest-virtualenv-1.2.11-2.fc28.noarch.rpm
python-pytest-virtualenv-1.2.11-2.fc28.src.rpm
python2-pytest-virtualenv.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) py -> pt, p,
y
python2-pytest-virtualenv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
teardown -> tear down, tear-down, downhearted
python3-pytest-virtualenv.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) py -> pt, p,
y
python3-pytest-virtualenv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
teardown -> tear down, tear-down, downhearted
python-pytest-virtualenv.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) py -> pt, p, y
python-pytest-virtualenv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US teardown
-> tear down, tear-down, downhearted
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488101
Bug ID: 1488101
Summary: Review Request: eclipse-recommenders - Eclipse Code
Recommenders
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: mat.booth(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/eclipse-recommenders.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/eclipse-recommenders-2.4.9-1.fc28.…
Description:
Code Recommenders automatically analyzes existing code using APIs and extracts
common usage rules and patterns from it. In the form of recommendation models,
this knowledge is then fed back into your IDE. Code Recommenders’ intelligent
code completion and augmented API documentation then utilizes the power of
these models to provide you with the solutions implemented by other developers
in the past. This helps you to get up to speed with the new framework or API
without countless hours of searching the Internet for the solutions to common
problems.
Fedora Account System Username: mbooth
Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=21645907
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component