https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #81 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #78)
> (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #77)
> > (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76)
> > > let's move on, please request the repo using ->
> > >
> > > $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
> > Would you volunteer to maintain the fdk-aac-nonfree counterpart in RPM
> > Fusion ?
> I would even re-phrase to: You are designed volunter to maintain the
> fdk-aac-nonfree along the current fedora fdk-aac maintainer. Now do the work!
I wouldn't say it like that. We can't force anyone working on anything. Rather
the other way around - a current fdk-aac maintained in RF should handle it.
Put it simply it's RF who is the second class citizen here, not the other way
around. So it's a RF maintainer's duty to cope with the Fedora changes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|182235 (FE-Legal) |
--- Comment #80 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #79)
> (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76)
> > let's move on, please request the repo using ->
> >
> > $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
>
> Please don't. I put back the FE-Legal block waiting for an answer from the
> FSF.
They don't have power over this ticket / Bugzilla.
We've got explanation from spot so I think you shouldn't block it again.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235
[Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546544
Till Hofmann <thofmann(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags| |needinfo?(mgansser(a)online.d
| |e)
--- Comment #3 from Till Hofmann <thofmann(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Martin, are you still working on this? Once you've fixed the issues above, I
will continue reviewing the package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #79 from Kevin Kofler <kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org> ---
(In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76)
> let's move on, please request the repo using ->
>
> $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
Please don't. I put back the FE-Legal block waiting for an answer from the FSF.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562794
Bug ID: 1562794
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-kevinburke-ssh-config -
Go parser for ssh_config files
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-kevinburke-ssh-config…
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-kevinburke-ssh-config…
Description:
Package ssh_config provides tools for manipulating SSH config files.
Importantly, this parser attempts to preserve comments in a given file, so you
can manipulate a `ssh_config` file from a program, if your heart desires.
The Get() and GetStrict() functions will attempt to read values from
$HOME/.ssh/config, falling back to /etc/ssh/ssh_config. The first argument is
the host name to match on ("example.com"), and the second argument is the key
you want to retrieve ("Port"). The keywords are case insensitive.
Fedora Account System Username: rathann
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #78 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #77)
> (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76)
> > let's move on, please request the repo using ->
> >
> > $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
> Would you volunteer to maintain the fdk-aac-nonfree counterpart in RPM
> Fusion ?
I would even re-phrase to: You are designed volunter to maintain the
fdk-aac-nonfree along the current fedora fdk-aac maintainer. Now do the work!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522
--- Comment #77 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #76)
> let's move on, please request the repo using ->
>
> $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
Would you volunteer to maintain the fdk-aac-nonfree counterpart in RPM Fusion ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562840
Bug ID: 1562840
Summary: Review Request: golang-gopkg-warnings-0 - Error
handling with non-fatal errors (warnings)
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-gopkg-warnings-0/golang-gopk…
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-gopkg-warnings-0/golang-gopk…
Description:
A recurring programming pattern pattern is to allow interrupting the flow on
any
received error. But what if there are errors that should be noted but still not
fatal, for which the flow should not be interrupted? Implementing such logic at
each if statement would make the code complex and the flow much harder to
follow.
Package warnings provides the Collector type and a clean and simple pattern for
achieving such logic. The Collector takes care of deciding when to break the
flow and when to continue, collecting any non-fatal errors (warnings) along the
way. The only requirement is that fatal and non-fatal errors can be
distinguished programmatically.
Fedora Account System Username: rathann
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562790
Bug ID: 1562790
Summary: Review Request: /golang-github-pelletier-buffruneio -
Rune-based buffered input
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-pelletier-buffruneio/…
SRPM URL:
https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/golang-github-pelletier-buffruneio/…
Description: Buffruneio provides rune-based buffered input.
Fedora Account System Username: rathann
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component