package-review May 2020

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
953 discussions

[Bug 1643764] Review Request: intelhex - A python library for manipulating Intel HEX file format
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '20

12 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643764 Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |ppisar(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 0

[Bug 1020292] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer-to-peer digital currency
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '20

12 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292 --- Comment #55 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Suvayu from comment #54) > Unless Fedora can > guarantee that the distributed binary will be identical to the upstream > binary This can never happen. Libraries, compilers, etc. will be different. Based on the same logic there should be one and only Linux distribution that everybody uses. > or at least Fedora infrastructure will provide sufficient > information to the user such that they can verify the Fedora packaged > binaries aren't compromised, Fedora should not be including this in the > repo. Events since 2017 have shown this is an important concern. This can be guaranteed by the various chain of trust (builders, package signatures, etc.) and is easily verifiable. Putting this under doubt means saying the distribution can not be trusted at all and any binary/pacakge in it can be compromised easily. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 0

[Bug 1020292] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer-to-peer digital currency
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '20

12 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292 --- Comment #54 from Suvayu <fatkasuvayu(a)gmail.com> --- If I may chime in, not an expert on Bitcoin, but I do follow some of the technical discussion in the community. As I understand it, security of the distributed binary is of utmost importance. I believe to that effect, upstream now builds its releases in reproducible builds (some info might be here: https://bitcoinops.org/en/topics/reproducible-builds/) Unless Fedora can guarantee that the distributed binary will be identical to the upstream binary, or at least Fedora infrastructure will provide sufficient information to the user such that they can verify the Fedora packaged binaries aren't compromised, Fedora should not be including this in the repo. Events since 2017 have shown this is an important concern. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 0

[Bug 1020292] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer-to-peer digital currency
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '20

12 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292 --- Comment #53 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Michael Hampton from comment #2) > I'm happy to co-maintain this, especially since you've based this on my > previous work. Please feel free to jump in and comaintain! Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 0

[Bug 1020292] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer-to-peer digital currency
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '20

12 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292 Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed|2013-10-22 09:35:04 |2020-05-12 10:10:22 --- Comment #52 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> --- Thanks! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1834731 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 0

[Bug 1020292] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer-to-peer digital currency
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '20

12 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292 --- Comment #51 from Juan Orti Alcaine <j.orti.alcaine(a)gmail.com> --- Go ahead, no problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 0

[Bug 1020292] Review Request: bitcoin - Peer-to-peer digital currency
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '20

12 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020292 --- Comment #50 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> --- I've been packaging the software for myself for a few years now, if there is no answer to this ticket from the original poster I will re-create the review and close this as a duplicate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 0

[Bug 1816733] New: Review Request: rust-libslirp - High-level bindings & helper process for libslirp
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 12 May '20

12 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816733 Bug ID: 1816733 Summary: Review Request: rust-libslirp - High-level bindings & helper process for libslirp Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: marcandre.lureau(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-libslirp.spec SRPM URL: https://elmarco.fedorapeople.org/rust-libslirp-4.0.0-1.fc33.src.rpm Description: High-level bindings & helper process for libslirp Fedora Account System Username: elmarco -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 8

[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 May '20

11 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 Bubblyhubs1 <bubblyhub1999(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bubblyhub1999(a)gmail.com Flags|needinfo?(puntogil(a)libero.i | |t) | --- Comment #117 from Bubblyhubs1 <bubblyhub1999(a)gmail.com> --- View Delhi Models http://www.escortagencydelhi.com/ View Complete Profile http://www.bubblyhub.in/index.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 0

[Bug 1570551] Review Request: pgcli - Postgres CLI with autocompletion and syntax highlighting
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 May '20

11 May '20

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570551 Bug 1570551 depends on bug 1570555, which changed state. Bug 1570555 Summary: Review Request: python-pgspecial - Python implementation of postgres meta commands (backslash commands) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570555 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 0

← Newer
1
...
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
...
96
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review May 2020