package-review November 2022

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
637 discussions

[Bug 1985116] New: Review Request: wildmatch - C/C++ library for git/rsync-style pattern matching
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Nov '22

17 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985116 Bug ID: 1985116 Summary: Review Request: wildmatch - C/C++ library for git/rsync-style pattern matching Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: dcavalca(a)fb.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/wildmatch/wildmatch.spec SRPM URL: https://dcavalca.fedorapeople.org/review/wildmatch/wildmatch-0.9-1.fc35.src… Description: wildmatch is a BSD-licensed C/C++ library for git/rsync-style pattern matching. Fedora Account System Username: dcavalca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

1 6

[Bug 2051854] New: Review Request: oneVPL-intel-gpu - Intel oneVPL GPU Runtime
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Nov '22

17 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051854 Bug ID: 2051854 Summary: Review Request: oneVPL-intel-gpu - Intel oneVPL GPU Runtime Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: negativo17(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/oneVPL-intel-gpu.spec SRPM URL: https://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/oneVPL-intel-gpu-22.2.0-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Intel® oneVPL GPU Runtime is a Runtime implementation of oneVPL API for Intel Gen GPUs. Runtime provides access to hardware-accelerated video decode, encode and filtering. Fedora Account System Username: slaanesh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051854

1 16

[Bug 1410992] Review Request: git-phab - Git subcommand to integrate with phabricator
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Nov '22

17 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410992 soumilkadam(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |soumilkadam(a)gmail.com --- Comment #3 from soumilkadam(a)gmail.com --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version 2", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License". 8 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/soumil/1410992-git-phab/licensecheck.txt [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [ ]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments [ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/#_use_rpmlint [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 3.3 starting (python version = 3.10.8, NVR = mock-3.3-1.fc36)... Start(bootstrap): init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish(bootstrap): init plugins Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins INFO: Signal handler active Start: run Start(bootstrap): chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled package manager cache Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin Mock Version: 3.3 INFO: Mock Version: 3.3 Finish(bootstrap): chroot init Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled package manager cache Start: cleaning package manager metadata Finish: cleaning package manager metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin Mock Version: 3.3 INFO: Mock Version: 3.3 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /builddir/git-phab-2.0.0-1.fc38.noarch.rpm ERROR: Command failed: # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M 5a5038bac3eb4d4cb851e01e8bd2a620 -D /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap/root -a --capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.g9qfq273:/etc/resolv.conf --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;<mock-chroot>\007" --setenv=PS1=<mock-chroot> \s-\v\$ --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 38 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install /builddir/git-phab-2.0.0-1.fc38.noarch.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Cannot parse rpmlint output: Requires -------- git-phab (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/python3 python(abi) python3-GitPython python3-appdirs python3-argcomplete python3-phabricator python3.11dist(appdirs) python3.11dist(argcomplete) python3.11dist(gitpython) python3.11dist(phabricator) Provides -------- git-phab: git-phab python3.11dist(git-phab) python3dist(git-phab) Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1410992 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: fonts, Java, Haskell, SugarActivity, PHP, Python, R, Perl, Ocaml, C/C++ Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410992

1 0

[Bug 1258542] Review Request: hack-fonts - A typeface designed for source code
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Nov '22

17 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542 Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hegjon(a)gmail.com --- Comment #48 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon(a)gmail.com> --- I would like this package for SILE https://sile-typesetter.org/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258542

1 0

[Bug 2010119] New: Review Request: amfora - terminal browser for the Gemini protocol
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 17 Nov '22

17 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010119 Bug ID: 2010119 Summary: Review Request: amfora - terminal browser for the Gemini protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: adamj(a)mailbox.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/adamthiede/gemini/fedora… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/adamthiede/gemini/fedora… Description: Fancy terminal browser for Gemini (new Internet protocol, like gopher) Fedora Account System Username: adamthiede This is my first package and I will require a sponsor. I am not the upstream maintainer but have permission/endorsement to package this for Fedora. I welcome and and all corrections or suggestions. A successful copr build lives here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/adamthiede/gemini/build/2872400/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2010119

1 7

[Bug 2138353] New: Review Request: rnp - OpenPGP (RFC4880) tools
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Nov '22

16 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138353 Bug ID: 2138353 Summary: Review Request: rnp - OpenPGP (RFC4880) tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: fedora(a)famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/lib/rnp.git/plain/rnp.spec?id=2b474395f7… SRPM URL: https://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/rnp-0.16.2-2.remi.src.rpm Description: RNP is a set of OpenPGP (RFC4880) tools. Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138353

1 40

[Bug 2082886] New: Review Request: python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd - Nagios plugin to check systemd
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Nov '22

16 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 Bug ID: 2082886 Summary: Review Request: python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd - Nagios plugin to check systemd Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: thofmann(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd.spec SRPM URL: https://thofmann.fedorapeople.org/python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd-2.3.1… Description: This systemd check for nagios compatible monitoring systems will report a degraded systemd to your monitoring solution. It can also be used to monitor individual systemd services and timers units. Fedora Account System Username: thofmann COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/thofmann/nagios-plugins/ koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86792294 fedora-review run on COPR: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/thofmann/nagios-plugins/… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886

1 17

[Bug 2141070] New: Review Request: rust-yeslogic-fontconfig-sys - Raw bindings to Fontconfig without a vendored C library
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 16 Nov '22

16 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141070 Bug ID: 2141070 Summary: Review Request: rust-yeslogic-fontconfig-sys - Raw bindings to Fontconfig without a vendored C library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: klember(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-yeslogic-fontconfig-sys.spec SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/rust-yeslogic-fontconfig-sys-2.11.2-1.fc38.s… Description: Raw bindings to Fontconfig without a vendored C library. Fedora Account System Username: kalev Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=93951048 Note that there's a newer upstream version available, but I specifically packaged the older 2.11.2 for librsvg2 use as that's the version it requires. The newer version also adds a license file that we can package. I'll look into updating it once we get an initial librsvg2 build with non-bundled rust dependencies out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2141070

1 7

[Bug 2137932] New: Review Request: bzip3 - Tools for compressing and decompressing bzip3 files
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Nov '22

15 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137932 Bug ID: 2137932 Summary: Review Request: bzip3 - Tools for compressing and decompressing bzip3 files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/bzip3/bzip3.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/bzip3/bzip3-1.1.8-1.fc38.src.rpm Description: These are tools for compressing, decompressing, printing, and searching bzip3 files. bzip3 features higher compression ratios and better performance than bzip2 thanks to an order-0 context mixing entropy coder, a fast Burrows-Wheeler transform code making use of suffix arrays and a run-length encoding with Lempel-Ziv prediction pass based on LZ77-style string matching and PPM-style context modeling. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2137932

1 30

[Bug 2139489] New: Review Request: golang-sr-rockorager-tcell-term - None
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 15 Nov '22

15 Nov '22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139489 Bug ID: 2139489 Summary: Review Request: golang-sr-rockorager-tcell-term - None Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: gotmax(a)e.email QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gotmax23/reviews/fedora-… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gotmax23/reviews/fedora-… Automated Fedora Review URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/gotmax23/reviews/fedora-… Description: None. Fedora Account System Username gotmax23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139489

1 18

← Newer
1
...
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
...
64
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review November 2022