package-review January 2025

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
633 discussions

[Bug 2318062] New: Review Request: rust-ansi-to-tui - Library to convert ansi color coded text into ratatui::text::Text type from ratatui library
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 May '25

20 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318062 Bug ID: 2318062 Summary: Review Request: rust-ansi-to-tui - Library to convert ansi color coded text into ratatui::text::Text type from ratatui library Product: Fedora Version: 41 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: solomoncyj(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… Description: Library to convert ansi color coded text into ratatui::text::Text type from ratatui library Fedora Account System Username: solomoncyj Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318062 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2318061] New: Review Request: rust-include_dir_macros - Procedural macro used by include_dir
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 May '25

20 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318061 Bug ID: 2318061 Summary: Review Request: rust-include_dir_macros - Procedural macro used by include_dir Product: Fedora Version: 41 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: solomoncyj(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… Description: Procedural macro used by include_dir Fedora Account System Username: solomoncyj Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318061 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2318060] New: Review Request: rust-include_dir - Embed the contents of a directory in your binary
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 May '25

20 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318060 Bug ID: 2318060 Summary: Review Request: rust-include_dir - Embed the contents of a directory in your binary Product: Fedora Version: 41 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: solomoncyj(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… Description: Embed the contents of a directory in your binary Fedora Account System Username: solomoncyj Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318060 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2318048] New: Review Request: rust-serial-unix - Serial port implementation for Unix
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 May '25

20 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318048 Bug ID: 2318048 Summary: Review Request: rust-serial-unix - Serial port implementation for Unix Product: Fedora Version: 41 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: solomoncyj(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… Description: Routines for safe string operations Fedora Account System Username: solomoncyj Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318048 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 14

[Bug 2318056] New: Review Request: rust-oneshot - Oneshot spsc channel with (potentially) lock-free non-blocking send
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 May '25

20 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318056 Bug ID: 2318056 Summary: Review Request: rust-oneshot - Oneshot spsc channel with (potentially) lock-free non-blocking send Product: Fedora Version: 41 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: solomoncyj(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… Description: Oneshot spsc channel with (potentially) lock-free non-blocking send Fedora Account System Username: solomoncyj Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318056 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 3

[Bug 2318050] New: Review Request: rust-tui-term - A pseudoterminal widget for ratatui
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 May '25

20 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318050 Bug ID: 2318050 Summary: Review Request: rust-tui-term - A pseudoterminal widget for ratatui Product: Fedora Version: 41 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: solomoncyj(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/solomoncyj/rust/fedora-4… Description: A pseudoterminal widget for ratatui Fedora Account System Username: solomoncyj Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2318050 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

2 5

[Bug 2335618] New: Review Request: Aegisub - Tool for creating and modifying subtitles
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 20 May '25

20 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2335618 Bug ID: 2335618 Summary: Review Request: Aegisub - Tool for creating and modifying subtitles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: elfile4138(a)elfile4138.moe QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Package: Aegisub Description: Aegisub is an advanced subtitle editor which assists in the creation of subtitles, timing, and editing of subtitle files. It supports a wide range of formats and provides powerful visual typesetting tools. Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/el-file4138/Aegisub/fedo… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/el-file4138/Aegisub/fedo… Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/el-file4138/Aegisub/build/8471731/ Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=127557570 Fedora Account System Username: el-file4138 Issues: - New contributors Requesting to be sponsored. Self Introduction: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org… - Spec file mismatch Used %autochangelog. - No documentation Upstream did not provide documentation. The manual can be viewed on the project website. - Bundled library Bundled library `luabins` is in form of pure source code, is not included in Fedora Package registry, and does not provide additional shared library. Not sure whether this requires FPC grants, but if do hereby requesting. - Project Licensing Upstream hasn't finished clearing the decade-old codebase, thus the licensing is diversified: Declared in Meson Builds (Currently acknowledged project-wide license): BSD-3-Clause LICENCE file: BSD-3-Clause for the project, and indicates: src/gl/ - MIT license. See src/gl/glext.h src/MatroskaParser.(c|h) - Licensed to BSDL with permission from the author. # Not included currently universalchardet/ - MPL 1.1 Auto scanned: GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)] --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Copied from AviSynth, GPL-2.0 project but grants exemption from GPL license src/avisynth.h MIT License ----------- automation/autoload/cleantags-autoload.lua automation/include/cleantags.lua # Included subproject subprojects/luabins/COPYRIGHT subprojects/luabins/src/luabins.h ISC License ----------- automation/autoload/select-overlaps.moon automation/autoload/strip-tags.lua automation/include/aegisub/argcheck.moon automation/include/aegisub/clipboard.lua automation/include/aegisub/ffi.moon ... 339 file omitted Auto scanned with correction: Khronos License --------------- # Corrected by LICENCE file src/gl/glext.h *No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 2 ---------------------------------------------------- # All locale file are distributed under the same license with the main project po/fi.po po/fr_FR.po po/pt_BR.po po/tr.po po/zh_CN.po po/zh_TW.po *** Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 3-Clause License", "*No copyright* BSD 3-Clause License", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 2", "ISC License", "GNU General Public License v2.0 or later [obsolete FSF postal address (Mass Ave)]", "MIT License", "Khronos License". 989 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /review-Aegisub/licensecheck.txt [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [?]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 3962880 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: Aegisub-3.4.1-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm Aegisub-3.4.1-1.fc42.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpv5t98rhx')] checks: 32, packages: 2 Aegisub.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary aegisub Aegisub.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: Aegisub-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc42.x86_64.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp6rmwyg9c')] checks: 32, packages: 1 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.7 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 2 Aegisub.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary aegisub Aegisub.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 9 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.6 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/TypesettingTools/Aegisub/releases/download/v3.4.1/Aegisu… : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 58ec2420be98a7dc71d25b24be190515b6e158bd325f019346452aa134e87e95 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 58ec2420be98a7dc71d25b24be190515b6e158bd325f019346452aa134e87e95 Requires -------- Aegisub (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libGL.so.1()(64bit) libasound.so.2()(64bit) libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit) libass.so.9()(64bit) libboost_locale.so.1.83.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcurl.so.4()(64bit) libffms2.so.5()(64bit) libfftw3.so.3()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3.1)(64bit) libhunspell-1.7.so.0()(64bit) libicui18n.so.76()(64bit) libicuuc.so.76()(64bit) libluajit-5.1.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libopenal.so.1()(64bit) libportaudio.so.2()(64bit) libpulse.so.0()(64bit) libpulse.so.0(PULSE_0)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.11)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.13)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.15)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.2)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.5)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.7)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.8)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3.9)(64bit) libuchardet.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) libwx_baseu_xml-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_baseu_xml-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_core-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_core-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_gl-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_gl-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_stc-3.2.so.0()(64bit) libwx_gtk3u_stc-3.2.so.0(WXU_3.2)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- Aegisub: Aegisub Aegisub(x86-64) application() application(org.aegisub.Aegisub.desktop) metainfo() metainfo(org.aegisub.Aegisub.metainfo.xml) mimehandler(application/x-srt) mimehandler(text/plain) mimehandler(text/x-ass) mimehandler(text/x-microdvd) mimehandler(text/x-ssa) Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /media/WorkDir/Documents/Projects/Coding/Others/rpm/aegisub/Aegisub.spec 2025-01-04 23:57:01.953033399 +0100 +++ /media/WorkDir/Documents/Projects/Coding/Others/rpm/aegisub/review-Aegisub/srpm-unpacked/Aegisub.spec 2025-01-04 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,7 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.7.3) +## RPMAUTOSPEC: autochangelog +## END: Set by rpmautospec + %global gituser TypesettingTools %global altname aegisub @@ -80,3 +85,6 @@ %changelog -%autochangelog \ 文件末尾没有换行符 +## START: Generated by rpmautospec +* Sat Jan 04 2025 John Doe <packager(a)example.com> - 3.4.1-1 +- Uncommitted changes +## END: Generated by rpmautospec Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n Aegisub Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: C/C++, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Python, Perl, Haskell, fonts, Ocaml, Java, SugarActivity, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2335618 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 24

[Bug 2279333] New: Review Request: elementary-greeter - LightDM Login Screen for the elementary desktop
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 May '25

19 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279333 Bug ID: 2279333 Summary: Review Request: elementary-greeter - LightDM Login Screen for the elementary desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: decathorpe(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/elementary-greeter.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/elementary-greeter-7.0.0-2.20240402.git… Description: The elementary Greeter is a styled Login Screen for LightDM. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279333 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 11

[Bug 2094246] New: Review Request: gnunet - The GNUnet Peer-to-Peer Framework
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 19 May '25

19 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094246 Bug ID: 2094246 Summary: Review Request: gnunet - The GNUnet Peer-to-Peer Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: schanzen(a)gnunet.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Hi, this is my first packaging request. I am the co-maintainer of this GNU package and would be willing to maintain the Fedora RPM package for it. For now, I am doing this via Copr. I am still in need of a sponsor. The package is currently divided into three parts: - gnunet: The base component including most of the services and libraries - gnunet-*-plugins: Optional database plugins - gnunet-devel: The ususal headers etc - gnunet-bcd: A business card generation tool (needs latex) - gnunet-conversation: A VoP2P service (needs gtreamer et al.) Cheers Spec URL: https://git.gnunet.org/gnunet-rpm.git/log/?h=dev/schanzen/copr SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/schanzen/gnunet/fedora-r… Copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/schanzen/gnunet Description: GNUnet is peer-to-peer framework providing a network abstractions and applications focusing on security and privacy. So far, we have created applications for anonymous file-sharing, decentralized naming and identity management, decentralized and confidential telephony and tunneling IP traffic over GNUnet. GNUnet is currently developed by a worldwide group of independent free software developers. GNUnet is a GNU package (http://www.gnu.org/) Fedora Account System Username: schanzen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094246

1 12

[Bug 2336907] New: Review Request: zmusic - GZDoom's music system as a standalone library
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 18 May '25

18 May '25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2336907 Bug ID: 2336907 Summary: Review Request: zmusic - GZDoom's music system as a standalone library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: cheembox573(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://xbt573.fedorapeople.org/review/zmusic/zmusic.spec SRPM URL: https://xbt573.fedorapeople.org/review/zmusic/zmusic-1.1.14-1.fc42.src.rpm Description: GZDoom's music system as a standalone library Fedora Account System Username: xbt573 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2336907 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 7

← Newer
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
64
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review January 2025