https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133482
Bug ID: 2133482
Summary: Review Request: stansoft - A streamlined accounting
software solution
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: rpm(a)stansoft.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://stansoft.sourceforge.net/dl/stansoft.spec
SRPM URL: https://stansoft.sourceforge.net/dl/stansoft-8.1-1.fc36.src.rpm
Description: Stansoft is a comprehensive double-entry financial accounting
system.
It includes payroll for both the U.S. and UK. It is
HMRC-recognised
for UK PAYE RTI payroll and MTD VAT returns.
Fedora Account System Username: stansoft
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133482
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276549
Bug ID: 2276549
Summary: cars-sports-racing
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/cars-sports-racing/
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: low
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: bertauxx(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
I left the Speed Dreams project to found my own project more in line with what
I originally wanted to do with the project.
I have just released version 1.0 of the cars-sports-racing project (also on
Sourceforge: https://sourceforge.net/projects/cars-sports-racing/files/1.0.0/
The main difference at the moment is that this project is focused on unlocking
challenges to be able to access the following races and other cars, I have also
removed the OpenSceneGraph engine which remains a very good library but which
is no longer developed ( just in maintenance), I'm leaning more towards an
internal OpenGL3 engine.
The long-term objective of this project is to have a career mode integrated
directly into the internal engine.
Do you think this project can be included in Fedora ?
Cheers
Xavier BERTAUX
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276549
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354856
Bug ID: 2354856
Summary: Review Request: wolfssl - Lightweight SSL/TLS library
written in ANSI C
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/kni/wolfssl/fedora-rawhi…
SRPM URL:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/kni/wolfssl/fedora-rawhi…
Description:
The wolfSSL embedded SSL library (formerly CyaSSL) is a lightweight SSL/TLS
library written in ANSI C and targeted for embedded, RTOS, and
resource-constrained environments - primarily because of its small size,
speed, and feature set. It is commonly used in standard operating environments
as well because of its royalty-free pricing and excellent cross platform
support. wolfSSL supports industry standards up to the current TLS 1.3 and
DTLS 1.3, is up to 20 times smaller than OpenSSL, and offers progressive
ciphers such as ChaCha20, Curve25519, Blake2b and Post-Quantum TLS 1.3 groups.
User bench-marking and feedback reports dramatically better performance when
using wolfSSL over OpenSSL.
wolfSSL is powered by the wolfCrypt cryptography library. Two versions of
wolfCrypt have been FIPS 140-2 validated (Certificate #2425 and certificate
#3389). FIPS 140-3 validation is in progress. For additional information,
visit the wolfCrypt FIPS FAQ or contact fips.
Fedora Account System Username:
kni
RPMLINT:
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.6.1
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 6
wolfssl.src: E: spelling-error ('wolfCrypt', '%description -l en_US wolfCrypt
-> wolf Crypt, wolf-crypt, Cryptozoic')
wolfssl.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('wolfCrypt', '%description -l en_US
wolfCrypt -> wolf Crypt, wolf-crypt, Cryptozoic')
wolfssl-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wolfssl-config
wolfssl.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl
/usr/lib64/libwolfssl.so.43.0.0 SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings, 40 filtered, 2
badness; has taken 2.6 s
RPMLINT RESPONSES:
>wolfssl.src: E: spelling-error ('wolfCrypt', '%description -l en_US wolfCrypt -> wolf Crypt, wolf-crypt, Cryptozoic')
>wolfssl.x86_64: E: spelling-error ('wolfCrypt', '%description -l en_US wolfCrypt -> wolf Crypt, wolf-crypt, Cryptozoic')
This is the proper name of the project, thus these errors can be ignored
>wolfssl-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wolfssl-config
wolfssl-config is dynamically created during configure. The authors have not
provided a man page for this executable. This is by design:
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssl/blob/master/debian/include.am#L60
>wolfssl.x86_64: W: crypto-policy-non-compliance-openssl /usr/lib64/libwolfssl.so.43.0.0 SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list
Fedora Packaging Reference:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/
This version of Wolfssl has been built with a new --with-sys-crypto-policy
flag, which is intended to satisfy Fedora crypto policies.
Additional backgound will be provided in the next post
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354856
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2301667
Bug ID: 2301667
Summary: Review Request: gnudos - A GNU library to help new
users of the GNU system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: mohammed_isam1984(a)yahoo.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://mohammedisam.fedorapeople.org/gnudos.spec
SRPM URL: https://mohammedisam.fedorapeople.org/gnudos-2.0-1.fc40.src.rpm
Description: GnuDOS package is a GNU software. It is a library designed to help
new users of the GNU system, who are coming from a DOS background, fit into the
picture and start using the GNU system with ease. It also addresses the console
programmers of such programs that have the look and feel of old DOS system.
The library is composed of core utilities and software applications:
* The core library (corelib) contains three components: Kbd (for keyboard
handling), Screen (for screen drawing), and Dialogs (for dialog boxes/window
drawing).
* The software applications are: Prime (console file manager), and Mino
(console text editor).
Fedora Account System Username: mohammedisam
Note for reviewers:
GnuDOS was a Fedora package up until f39. Due to different issues I was unable
to continue maintaining this package. I wish to resume being a maintainer for
this package, and the guidelines for orphaned and retired packages say I need
to go through the review process from the beginning. I appreciate if someone
can review the package and help me restore it to Fedora.
I have completed a Koji build, which you can see here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=121247538
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2301667
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…