package-review May 2026

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
299 discussions

[Bug 2477520] New: Review Request: args - Simple, small, flexible, single-header C++11 argument parsing library
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Jun '26

11 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2477520 Bug ID: 2477520 Summary: Review Request: args - Simple, small, flexible, single-header C++11 argument parsing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: carlwgeorge(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedo… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedo… Description: A simple, small, flexible, single-header C++11 argument parsing library. This is designed to appear somewhat similar to Python's argparse, but in C++, with static type checking, and hopefully a lot faster (also allowing fully nestable group logic, where Python's argparse does not). Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge This review already took place in bug 2439787, but I created that bug with my work email and have since switched my FAS to my personal email. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2477520 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 4

[Bug 2461130] New: Review Request: vlc-discordrpc-plugin - Discord Rich Presence plugin for VLC
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Jun '26

11 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461130 Bug ID: 2461130 Summary: Review Request: vlc-discordrpc-plugin - Discord Rich Presence plugin for VLC Product: Fedora Version: 42 Hardware: All URL: https://github.com/Zukaritasu/vlc-discordrpc-plugin OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Keywords: Desktop Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: zukaritasu(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description: This is a plugin specifically developed to display the user's activity in VLC on Discord through rich presence. This includes videos, music, images, or any multimedia content supported by VLC. Fedora Account System Username: [zukaritasu] URLs: Spec URL: [https://github.com/Zukaritasu/vlc-discordrpc-plugin/blob/main/fedora/vlc-di…] SRPM URL: [https://github.com/Zukaritasu/vlc-discordrpc-plugin/releases/download/1.2.1…] Reproducible: Always Actual Results: Package is not yet in Fedora repositories Expected Results: Package should be reviewed, approved, and admitted into the Fedora repositories -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2461130 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2354221] New: Review Request: python-vispy - Interactive visualization in Python
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Jun '26

11 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354221 Bug ID: 2354221 Summary: Review Request: python-vispy - Interactive visualization in Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: gui1ty(a)penguinpee.nl QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://gui1ty.fedorapeople.org/review/python-vispy.spec SRPM URL: https://gui1ty.fedorapeople.org/review/python-vispy-0.14.3-1.fc43.src.rpm Description: VisPy is a high-performance interactive 2D/3D data visualization library. VisPy leverages the computational power of modern Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) through the OpenGL library to display very large datasets. Applications of VisPy include: - High-quality interactive scientific plots with millions of points - Direct visualization of real-time data - Fast interactive visualization of 3D models (meshes, volume rendering) - OpenGL visualization demos - Scientific GUIs with fast, scalable visualization widgets (Qt or IPython notebook with WebGL) Fedora Account System Username: gui1ty -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354221 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 6

[Bug 2446035] New: Review Request for new Package: pva-base
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 11 Jun '26

11 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2446035 Bug ID: 2446035 Summary: Review Request for new Package: pva-base Product: Fedora Version: 42 Hardware: All URL: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mschwarz/pva/b uild/10207453/ OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: low Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: fedoradev(a)cloud-foo.de QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Fedora Releases: i hope for * Known Issues: readme.md in conf.d : required for context information regarding config. vosk-api-devel dependency: maintainer for vosk made a naming mistake for this package. matiwari(a)redhat.com is informed and promised to fix it. jars in SRPM: yes are deleted in %build This package is noarch and should be treated by koji as such later on. If you see an upcoming problem pls advise. Info: The package base was deployed successfully to real production system today. It's working \o/ Notes: - no big docs - no devel package required - pure java, with a sparkle of python for trayicons Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop- file-validate if there is such a file. - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file COPYING is not marked as %license See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text - Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on javapackages-tools (jpackage-utils) - Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage Note: No javadoc subpackage present. Note: Javadocs are optional for Fedora versions >= 21 See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation - Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink) Note: No javadoc subpackage present See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Javadoc_installation - Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build Note: Jar files in source (see attachment) See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- guidelines/Java/#_pre_built_dependencies ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [ ]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT License", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0 and/or GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0". 170 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/pva- base/licensecheck.txt [ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 49460 bytes in 18 files. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Maven: [ ]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even when building with ant [x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Java: [ ]: Package uses upstream build method (ant/maven/etc.) [x]: Packages are noarch unless they use JNI ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. Rpmlint ------- Checking: pva-base-0^20260310git0512938-1.fc42.noarch.rpm pva-base-0^20260310git0512938-1.fc42.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp8x8xh604')] checks: 32, packages: 2 pva-base.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pva/conf.d/README.md pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ai.py pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary chatgpt pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary f5tts pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary f5tts.py pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gsay pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary msay pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary piper pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary psay pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary recall-pva pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary samsungtts pva-base.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary say pva-base.spec: W: no-%check-section pva-base.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0^20260310git0512938 ['0^20260310git0512938-1.fc42', '0^20260310git0512938-1'] pva-base.noarch: E: devel-dependency vosk-api-devel 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 14 warnings, 6 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 0.3 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s (none): E: there is no installed rpm "pva-base". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/Cyborgscode/Personal-Voice-Assistent/archive/refs/heads/… : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 0674c3024a3d81233cfef6224a1ebb659d9f1c4171394bf13a4ce86e1cd2c314 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 0674c3024a3d81233cfef6224a1ebb659d9f1c4171394bf13a4ce86e1cd2c314 Requires -------- pva-base (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/bash /usr/bin/python3 config(pva-base) curl dbus-tools espeak ffmpeg gtts jakarta-activation jakarta-activation1 jakarta-mail jakarta-mail1 java-headless jna opencv-java openssl sox vosk-api-devel xdotool Provides -------- pva-base: application() application(PVA.desktop) application(pva-shutdown.desktop) config(pva-base) pva-base Jar and class files in source ----------------------------- ./pva-base-0_20260310git0512938-build/Personal-Voice-Assistent-main/lib/jna-5.18.1.jar ./pva-base-0_20260310git0512938-build/Personal-Voice-Assistent-main/lib/javax.mail-1.6.2.jar ./pva-base-0_20260310git0512938-build/Personal-Voice-Assistent-main/lib/javax.activation-1.2.0.jar ./pva-base-0_20260310git0512938-build/Personal-Voice-Assistent-main/lib/PLACEHOLDER- sqlite-jdbc-3.51.1.0.jar Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name pva-base --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-42-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java Disabled plugins: Perl, PHP, R, fonts, Python, Ocaml, SugarActivity, Haskell, C/C++ Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH Reproducible: Always Additional Information: Sponser: jskarvad(a)redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2446035 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 5

[Bug 2476902] New: Review Request: python-piper-tts - Fast and local neural text-to-speech engine
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jun '26

10 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2476902 Bug ID: 2476902 Summary: Review Request: python-piper-tts - Fast and local neural text-to-speech engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: Tom.Rix(a)amd.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/python-piper-tts.spec SRPM URL: https://trix.fedorapeople.org/python-piper-tts-1.4.2-1.fc45.src.rpm Reproducible: Always -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2476902 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 10

[Bug 2331268] New: Review Request: extension-manager - A native way of managing GNOME extensions
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jun '26

10 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331268 Bug ID: 2331268 Summary: Review Request: extension-manager - A native way of managing GNOME extensions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: rrahl0(a)opensuse.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rrahl0/fedora/fedora-raw… SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/rrahl0/fedora/fedora-raw… Description: The tool supports: Browsing and searching extensions from extensions.gnome.org Installation and Removal Enabling and Disabling Updating in-app (GNOME 43+) Screenshots & Images Ratings & Comments Translations (add your language!) Fedora Account System Username: rrahl0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331268 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 10

[Bug 2449216] New: Review Request: rust-pathrs - provides libpathrs, path operation primatives for linux
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jun '26

10 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2449216 Bug ID: 2449216 Summary: Review Request: rust-pathrs - provides libpathrs, path operation primatives for linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: bradley.g.smith(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://buckaroogeek.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-pathrs.spec SRPM URL: https://buckaroogeek.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rust-pathrs-0.2.4-1.fc45.src.… Description: "libpathrs provides a series of primitives for Linux programs to safely handle path operations inside an untrusted directory tree." Fedora Account System Username: buckaroogeek -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2449216 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 51

[Bug 2463742] New: Review Request: rust-abol-rt - Runtime traits and async abstractions for the Abol RADIUS framework
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jun '26

10 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2463742 Bug ID: 2463742 Summary: Review Request: rust-abol-rt - Runtime traits and async abstractions for the Abol RADIUS framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: asn(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol-rt.spec SRPM URL: https://asn.fedorapeople.org/rust-abol-rt-0.1.0-1.fc45.src.rpm Upstream URL: https://crates.io/crates/abol-rt Description: Runtime traits and async abstractions for the Abol RADIUS framework. Fedora Account System Username: asn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2463742 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 8

[Bug 2483666] New: Review Request: libE57Format - Library for reading & writing the E57 file format
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jun '26

10 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2483666 Bug ID: 2483666 Summary: Review Request: libE57Format - Library for reading & writing the E57 file format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: ypsvlq(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ypsvlq.fedorapeople.org/libE57Format.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1452/146111452/libE57Format-… Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=146111412 Description: Library for reading & writing the E57 file format Fedora Account System Username: ypsvlq This is a dependency of FreeCAD, which I intend to unretire. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2483666 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 19

[Bug 2417155] New: Review Request: python-universal-pathlib - Python pathlib API extended to use fsspec backends
by bugzilla＠redhat.com 10 Jun '26

10 Jun '26

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2417155 Bug ID: 2417155 Summary: Review Request: python-universal-pathlib - Python pathlib API extended to use fsspec backends Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://github.com/fsspec/universal_pathlib Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.analyst(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-universal-pathlib/python-un… SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-universal-pathlib/python-un… Description: Universal Pathlib is a Python library that extends the pathlib_abc.JoinablePath API to provide a pathlib.Path-like interface for a variety of backend filesystems via filesystem_spec. Fedora Account System Username: qulogic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2417155 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…

1 13

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review May 2026