Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484
--- Comment #11 from manuel wolfshant wolfy@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-02-20 11:55:18 EDT --- More a "pong" than a review, I';; be back a bit later:
rpmlint of twin: twin.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/twin-0.6.1/setroot.sample twin.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/twin-0.6.1/LICENSING.INFO twin.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/twin-0.6.1/README.twsetroot
More serious stuff, I am a bit puzzled by this snipplet from the build log (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1133537&name=build.log ): checking for X... libraries , headers checking X11/xpm.h usability... no checking X11/xpm.h presence... no checking for X11/xpm.h... no checking for XpmReadFileToPixmap in -lXpm... no checking for gtk-config... no checking gtk/gtk.h usability... no checking gtk/gtk.h presence... no checking for gtk/gtk.h... no checking for gtk_init in -lgtk... no
It seems that BR gtk2-devel is not sufficient ?