https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344276
Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com
--- Comment #4 from Ken Dreyer ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com --- Would you please address each of Parag's comments above and update the package to the latest upstream version?
I'm a sponsor, so I can sponsor you if you would please do one satisfactory unofficial review of a package in Parag's links above, and ensure that this package gets cleaned up.
For example, this sort of boilerplate seems common in the Gluster community and is unneeded:
%define name gdeploy %define version 2.1 %define release 0
In fact it will break tools like rpmdev-bumpspec that Fedora rel-eng uses for mass rebuilds. It's better to simply define the values directly in the RPM:
Name: gdeploy Version: 2.1 Release: 1%{?dist}
The URL should be the upstream project, https://github.com/gluster/gdeploy, not Red Hat's storage website.