[Bug 197963] Review Request: bouncycastle

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197963

[e-mail] changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER           |ASSIGNED

------- Additional Comments From [e-mail]  2006-07-17 15:47 EST -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Is the intention of %{_javadir}/gcj-endorsed that only gcj (not other JVMs)
> should be using stuff from there?  Other JVMs, eg. the Sun one, would have
> problems with the jar because it's not signed.

Yes, I'm not supporting non-GNU Classpath based JVMs with this RPM.