https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971103
--- Comment #8 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsland@redhat.com --- Hi Peter,
(In reply to Peter Schiffer from comment #7)
Hi Douglas,
ah yes, I know about this error and I've already checked it. In this case, this shouldn't be a problem because the gid is not changed, the bsd-mailx binary doesn't have suid and sgid flags.
This error was introduced by 03-Base-fixes-2.patch. I don't think that it's realy worthy expanding the for loop applying upstream patches for better debugging things like this (which is probably only this one error, considering the bsd-mailx is not actively developed any more).
I am sorry, I disagree. The spec should be always simple and clear, without that I am not able to approve it, but you can always request other people to review it.
BTW, since bsd-mailx is not acively developed any more, you should be aware of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Cla...
"If you really want to maintain a deprecated package, you need to be aware that if upstream is dead, fixing release critical bugs, etc **becomes your responsibility.***"
Please let me know if you have any additional question.
Thanks Douglas