https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971103
Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203@freenet.de
--- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de --- (In reply to Peter Schiffer from comment #9)
Douglas,
listing 24 non-redhat patches doesn't make .spec file clear and simple, in my opinion.
Upstream is Debian,
I agree with Douglas - We should not inherit packages from secondary sources but from primary sources.
According to http://ftp-master.metadata.debian.org/changelogs/main/b/bsd-mailx/unstable_c... upstream is OpenBSD.
Anyway, http://ftp.de.debian.org/ is the German mirror of the Debian package repositories. The "generic Url" would be ftp://ftp.debian.org.
However, the actual Debian sources are in Debian's git: git://anonscm.debian.org/users/robert/bsd-mailx.git (c.f. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/robert/bsd-mailx.git)
Also, Debian's git is telling their package received its last change 2011-11-20. To me, this doesn't sound more maintained than the OpenBSD upstream.