Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585719
Terje Røsten terjeros@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(terjeros@phys.ntn | |u.no) |
--- Comment #16 from Terje Røsten terjeros@phys.ntnu.no 2010-07-02 15:47:41 EDT --- Hi Alain, sorry about the delay.
I started on a complete analyse of the license status. That job was a bit more complicated than expected (still more surprises in this package). Let's start with what I have so far.
o sdk/tinyxml/ -> seems to be a private copy of a lib already in Fedora, not allowed.
o src/codegen/codeparser.h src/codegen/codeparser.cpp -> no information about license,
o controls/src/wxScintilla/scintilla/src/RESearch.h controls/src/wxScintilla/scintilla/src/StyleContext.h -> Public Domain
o src/controls/include/wx/propgrid/* src/controls/include/wx/wxFlatNotebook/* src/controls/include/wx/wxScintilla/* -> wxWindows license? is that GPLv2+?
o src/controls/src/wxScintilla/scintilla/src/* a strange mix of -> BSD, wxWin, Public Domain, GPLv2+?
Would be nice you could comment on this findings and contact upstream about this fuzzy license status.