https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2017179
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zbyszek@in.waw.pl
--- Comment #9 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbyszek@in.waw.pl ---
%{_libdir}/*.so.*
Please specify the SO VERSION here, don't use a glob. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_listing_shared_l...
I don't think Unicode Strict can be accepted into Fedora, though. So we will have to wait on that issue. I have subscribed as well.
After looking at the original file, the license is problematic. The proposed solution of using the file in LLVM does not be a solution: I think LLVM is in "violation" of the literal license terms too, and they should not say that this file is available under the Apache2 license. I used quotes because it seems that the actual legal risk is negligible. Nevertheless, we want to keep everything kosher in Fedora, so we don't want to accept this minor violation.
utf8cpp seems like a better approach. [1] does a similar conversion, and it seems very straightforward. utf8cpp is in Fedora, so we'd want to just use the system library.
Note that this license was briefly discussed on legal@, but the question was sidestepped because the files weren't actually used [2].
[1] https://github.com/taglib/taglib/pull/794/files [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/...