https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150362
Kalev Lember klember@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(klember@redhat.co | |m) |
--- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember klember@redhat.com --- Hi Fabio,
Thanks for taking the review and sorry for the slow response!
(In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #2)
Oh oh, a GPLv3 project without a license file, that's not good. Looks like the upstream project hasn't been touched in a while, but Felix seems to be still active in the GNOME community - maybe you know how to reach out to him concerning issue#1 and possibly also issue#2?
Why a GPLv3 project without a license file specifically not good? Is it one of the licenses where it says that the license text must be distributed along with the source? I couldn't find anything that says so in the license text, but it's a fairly long text and I may have missed it.
Sure, I can try to reach out to Felix and other rust people that are involved in the project. Is the missing license text a blocker for the Fedora package?