https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673
--- Comment #67 from Michal Vala mvala@redhat.com ---
Imho except .build-id, license, which should be GPL2 [do we wont "with classpath exception"?] (javafxpackager BSD) and java/java-devel + self requires we are done here. Can you publish one more spec+srpm (eventually also with scratch) which we can test?
.build-id is clarified by Fabio Valentini and self requires seems to be correct in latest state.
Jonny: Can you please add requires java/java-devel and I suggest licenses as GPL2 with classpath exception + BSD for fxpackager?
If no-one has any other comments and you include these changes, I'll approve this review.
Thanks!