https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979668
Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |panemade@gmail.com Flags| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panemade@gmail.com --- Review:
+ mock build is successful for f20
+ rpmlint output on rpms gave 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm trball : efc22c4aa1fbe26112a53e4e637c7632b48ea429f2648cdb3207fc003e7540f9 upstream tarball : efc22c4aa1fbe26112a53e4e637c7632b48ea429f2648cdb3207fc003e7540f9
- License "GPLv2+ or Artistic" is NOT valid. I see its Artistic 1.0
+ rest follows packaging guidelines
+ make test is successful with output All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.06 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.10 CPU)
+ Package perl-HTML-Entities-Interpolate-1.04-1.fc20 Provides: perl(HTML::Entities::Interpolate) = 1.04 perl-HTML-Entities-Interpolate = 1.04-1.fc20
Requires: perl(HTML::Entities) perl(Tie::Function) perl(warnings)
Suggestions: 1) Get the license clarified with upstream.