Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652085
Haïkel Guémar karlthered@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |karlthered@gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |karlthered@gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Haïkel Guémar karlthered@gmail.com 2010-11-18 15:04:50 EST --- * license field should use standard short name: zlib instead of zlib/libpng. * unversionned shared libraries should go into appropriate devel subpackage * no %post & %postun for shared libraries subpackages * incoherent versionning in changelog: use major.minor.revision scheme ! * main package group should be "Development/Libraries" * any reason not shipping sfml bindings ? at least, you should enable C, Python, Ruby and D ;) * what's the status of sfml 1.6 ? are the two branches parallel installable ? if it's the case, you should consider renaming your package sfml2.