https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2316327
--- Comment #22 from Richard Fontana rfontana@redhat.com --- (In reply to Denny Dalessandro from comment #13)
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #12)
May want to check with egal, it is not o nthe allowed list https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/
The export restriction modifies it from BSD-3-Clause
I took the "EXPORT LAWS" clause to be separate from the BSD license. Hmm. Not sure what do make of that. I see you made this Bug block 182235, can we expect a response there? I'm not sure how this works. We inherited all of this stuff when we spun out from Intel and I'm assuming no one ever noticed because this stuff has been in distros for years.
Benson is correct that this is not `BSD-3-Clause` given the export language, which is part of the license. This if I'm not mistaken is the Intel Open Source License (SPDX `Intel`), an OSI-approved license that Intel used in the early 2000s but Intel deprecated it not long afterwards; I believe it may have been among the first examples of a deprecated OSI-approved license.
I don't know about the history of this project, but if people at Intel were using this license as recently as 2015 that was probably an error on their part.
It appears that `Intel` has never been reviewed for Fedora so an issue needs to be opened at fedora-license-data. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-review-process/