Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667
------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood@gmail.com 2008-01-14 18:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20)
Maybe. But I recall strange things happening with real package names always winning against versioned virtual provides, even when the virtual provides is higher.
Hm, ok, that looks like a bug to me.
Anyway, I have tested that without obsoletes, rpm -Uvh xdvik-22.84.13-3.fc9.i386.rpm doesn't uninstall xdvi and therefore doesn't proceeds because of conflicts.
So I guess that the Obsoletes is needed, and I think that Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12 is the cleanest.
OK, we'll go with that, simple.