https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1490053
Antonio Trande anto.trande@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anto.trande@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande anto.trande@gmail.com --- # The source for this package was pulled from scidavis's vcs. # There hasn't been a 3.0.0 release yet, nor have the changes made in scidavis's liborigin been backported. # Use the following commands to generate the source package: # wget https://github.com/highperformancecoder/scidavis/archive/7c6e07dfad80dbe190a... # tar -xzf scidavis-7c6e07df.tar.gz # tar -cvJf liborigin3-3.0.0-7c6e07df.tar.xz -C scidavis-7c6e07dfad80dbe190af29ffa8a56c82a8aa9180/3rdparty/ liborigin
I think it's not correct extracting a patched code from an archive and propose it as library that obsoletes the actual 'liborigin' libs.
Has "liborigin3" been proposed to upstream? (https://sourceforge.net/projects/liborigin/)
You could produce 'liborigin' from scidavis's vcs as a private SciDAVis library, as long as new changes are backported and tested as a new real 'liborigin' release.