https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827730
Bug ID: 827730 QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: notting@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nobody@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: trac-code-comments-plugin - Trac plugin for code comments and sending them to tickets Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: codeblock@elrod.me Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora
Spec URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/trac-code-comments-plugin/trac-co... SRPM URL: http://codeblock.fedorapeople.org/packages/trac-code-comments-plugin/trac-co... Description: This plugin allows you to leave comments on top of files, change sets, and attachments. Once you've added all of your comments, you can send them to tickets. These include links to these comments and their description. Fedora Account System Username: codeblock
Clean rpmlint, minus one warning because of how the source was obtained (upstream is a tarball downloaded from github).
[ricky@t520 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/trac-code-comments-plugin-1.2.0-alpha2.20120601gitb260714.fc18.src.rpm trac-code-comments-plugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0: Automattic-trac-code-comments-plugin-v1.0.1-52-gb260714.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
[ricky@t520 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/trac-code-comments-plugin-1.2.0-alpha2.20120601gitb260714.fc18.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Note that this does have several javascript libraries bundled with it with varying licenses. I've included (in %doc) a LICENSING_BREAKDOWN file which shows what is licensed differently from the plugin itself, as instructed here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensi...
Happy to clarify any of the licensing related things if I need to (or communicate with upstream to do so).