Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630
--- Comment #54 from Chen Lei supercyper@163.com 2010-02-23 23:08:44 EST --- (In reply to comment #52)
(In reply to comment #51)
Are you going to have a separate jogl-javadoc package, by the way, or will that come as part of the jogl package?
I'm going to build a separated javadock package. We already have this functional gluegen package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627#c35 but the main problem with JOGL is that it needs a side by side copy of gluegen to build his build.xml. The doubt here is if we can use this bundled gluegen in this initial step and discard it.
It's definitely not. You must using a git or svn version of gluegen. Maybe you need wrote some patches for gluegen to let jogl 1.1.1a build success with it.