Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: KTechlab - Development and simulation of microcontrollers and electronic circuits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206693
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-09-24 01:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #17)
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #14)
I'm not agree with the removal of Requires gputils gpsim.
Ktechlab requires gputils for PIC simulation.
Well, if it is common that Ktechlab is used for PIC simulation , in which case gputils is required generally, making Ktechlab require gputils is reasonable.
Quite easy to prove/counter-prove: Show us the piece of source code that introduces this dependency on gputils!
Well, autually: [tasaka1@localhost ktechlab-0.3]$ grep -r 'gputils' . ./doc/en/flowcode.docbook: <para>Of course, if you don't have gputils installed - with which <command>gpasm</command> is distributed - then the last step can't be performed.</para> ./src/languages/gpdasm.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Disassembly failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); ./src/languages/gpasm.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Assembly failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); ./src/languages/gplink.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Linking failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") ); ./src/languages/gplib.cpp: KMessageBox::sorry( LanguageManager::self()->logView(), i18n("Linking failed. Please check you have gputils installed.") );