https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2183400
Maxwell G maxwell@gtmx.me changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST
--- Comment #6 from Maxwell G maxwell@gtmx.me --- This package was generated using go2rpm, which simplifies the review. Normally, I'd go through the full template generated by the `fedora-review` tool.
Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
- [x] The specfile is sane. - [x] The License tag reflects the package contents and uses the correct identifiers. - [x] The package builds successfully in mock. - [x] Package is installable (checked by fedora-review). - [x] There are no relevant rpmlint errors - [x] The package runs tests in %check - [x] The latest version is packaged. - [x] `%goipath` is set correctly. - [x] The package's binaries don't conflict with binaries already in the distribution. (Some Go projects include utility binaries with very generic names) - [x] There are no wildcards in %files. (go2rpm includes these by default) - [x] The package complies with the Packaging Guidelines.
Package approved! On import, don't forget to do the following:
- [ ] Add the package to release-monitoring.org - [ ] Give go-sig privileges on the package - [ ] Close the review bug by referencing its ID in the rpm changelog and the Bodhi ticket.
I'll send you a separate email later with instructions since this is your first Package Review ticket.
Thanks!