Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896011
--- Comment #18 from Simone Caronni negativo17@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #17)
Nope, rpmlint complains if you leave it out. The soname is not enough for this check. However, it is not no-version-dependency-on, it is no-dependency-on:
libmsi1-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libmsi1/libmsi1-libs/liblibmsi1
Doh, that's new for me. Then leave it.
I uploaded a new version.
Spec URL: http://bonzini.fedorapeople.org/msitools.spec SRPM URL: http://bonzini.fedorapeople.org/msitools-0.91-1.fc18.src.rpm
The spec file is missing changelog for 0.91-1; and the rpm still points to 0.91-1. 0.91-2 throws a 404 in the same place. I need the links to run fedora-review.
The spec file is ok though, so i don't think there's any problem; as the link is available it should pass the review.
What you could do just to improve it a little bit is widen the description of the packages to 80 columns and format line 36.
Thanks, --Simone