https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2138353
--- Comment #15 from Benson Muite benson_muite@emailplus.org ---
a) Maybe a comment is needed in the spec file that the patents are no longer enforced?
I don't think it make sense to document the past ;) I also think there is a bug confusion between patent and license on this algo and "patent" are not allowed in Fedora But if you think this is a blocker I can add something
The file LICENSE-OCB.md is packaged, but based on explanation here and on GitHub, the correct situation is that that particular block encryption algorithm is no longer patented, so the information in LICENSE-OCB.md is inaccurate. Upstream will probably change something in how this is documented. It is not a blocker, but some comment may remind one to do an appropriate update on the next release. Probably the file should be named PREVIOUS-PATENT-OCB.md rather than LICENSE-OCB.md, but unclear what the upstream project will do.
d) Should obsoletes thunderbird-librnp-rnp be indicated?
Not needed (both can be installed) Rather to be obsoleted by thinderbird if they choice to use it
Ok. Great it does not conflict.