https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2215420
Jos de Kloe josdekloe@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC| |josdekloe@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Jos de Kloe josdekloe@gmail.com --- Hi Orion, thanks for working on this. Here are a first few remarks from a preliminary review.
Issues: ======= - If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/ - The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. Note: Not a valid SPDX expression 'GPL-3.0+'. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 ==>probably should be: "GPL-3.0-or-later" - Spec should use %global instead of %define unless justified Current version has "%define qt_version 5" - there is no %check section in the spec file ==>actually it is also to me not clear how a tool like this could be checked during the rpm build proces. - Related to this, I could not easily check if "the Package functions as described". According to the x2go wiki website: https://wiki.x2go.org/doku.php/wiki:advanced:x2gokdrive:start using this tool requires to rename x2gokdriveclient to the default name nxproxy and x2gokdrive to the default name x2goagent. Is it reasonable to expect this manual installation step from the user? Or did I overlook something?