Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560787
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal)
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2011-01-08 22:27:04 EST --- I can't say what the license would be. Does the original source not have license text either? It doesn't look like it does.
In any case, if it's just a simple modification of the original file, I have to wonder why our python package doesn't just carry the modifications. I went ahead and diffed the two files, but they seem to differ rather significantly. So much, in fact, that I have to question your statement that it's simply a modification of the original file. It looks to me more like it merely wraps the original classes and is a separate work which would carry its own license.
I'll go ahead and block FE-Legal; if you can get clarification from upstream then this can certainly proceed; otherwise perhaps the legal folks will see something indicating a license that I'm missing.