Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: dekorator - KDE window decoration engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229319
------- Additional Comments From cgoorah@yahoo.com.au 2007-02-20 16:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7)
The Bushido-Yellow-theme from the tarball does not do its masking properly (on my system at least) - it cuts out the central window titlebar-area, making it impossible to see the window title. I will see if I can edit the masks to make it work properly, otherwise, I'll remove the references from the help file (the other themes also demonstrate masking anyway). The theme is also available here: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=32163 ...but this version is not compatible with dekorator 0.3.
As for the "K-style: Infinity" theme: the version packaged with dekorator is broken, according to its author: http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=35590 I think a separate package for this theme (using the updated source) would be better.
Ok, I'm good with the explanations given. Can you include a "dekorator.fedora" file to the package which explains this choice. This "dekorator.fedora" file will be included in %doc
Simply because it's, well, ugly ;-), and obviously designed to be a teaching example, not an _actual_ theme... Should I rather install this by default? Or maybe put it in a subpackage? I was wondering about the "template" theme as well, but at least that one's usable and semi-nice to look at.
If this "ugly" theme isn't broken, I would like it to be installed as a theme. We should not forget that our users aren't stupid, they might be waiting to see it included. :)
I agree, this is *very* irritating. I will look into this; it shouldn't be too hard. I have a question, though: do you think I should make it so that the "Set Theme Path" button's actions are automatically performed when the user selects
a theme from the list (and thus remove the button completely)? Or should the
program only select an initial default theme, and leave the "set theme path" button as it is? Personally I feel the "set theme path" button is an unnecessary and unintuitive step and should be removed, but someone else's opinion would be greatly appreciated.
If you can do it, why not.