Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363
------- Additional Comments From petersen@redhat.com 2008-07-04 03:42 EST ------- (In reply to comment #24)
- Yes, after reconfirmation with llim, it's GPLv2.
I think you need to go through the source files and audit more carefully. Some are clearly GPLv2+ and a few LGPL.
- I don't think it's redhat-lsb requiring its own files, redhat-lsb and lsb are
2 different packages. For example, redhat-lsb may delegate the database querying job to lsb to find out the dependencies.
% repoquery -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd redhat-lsb-0:3.1-19.fc8.i386 % repoquery -q --whatprovides /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd redhat-lsb-0:3.1-19.fc8.i386 % rpm -qlp redhat-lsb-3.1-19.fc8.i386.rpm| grep _initd /usr/lib/lsb/install_initd /usr/lib/lsb/remove_initd
- I'd like to know why the path is intentionally hard-coded.
Because the directory name should be lib and not lib64 even on 64bit machines I guess.