Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=782560
--- Comment #4 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda bkabrda@redhat.com 2012-02-15 02:14:22 EST --- (In reply to comment #3)
Wouldn't Obsoletes: ruby(shadow) < 1.4.1-16 be better? 1.4.1-15.fc18 was the last version of the old package in Fedora and EPEL AFAICT.
Similarly, I think:
Obsoletes: ruby-shadow >= 1.4.1 Provides: ruby-shadow >= 1.4.1
should be more like:
Obsoletes: ruby-shadow < 1.4.1-16 Provides: ruby-shadow = %{version}-%{release}
Well, the guidelines for obsoleting are pretty clear, so it should really be the way I mentioned in comment2.
Is the '*' in the summary going to make life interesting for folks searching via yum? Maybe 'Ruby shadow password module' is good?
That's probably a good point :) Michael, I think that you should fix this (but not a blocker on my side).
(Just some comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks for packaging this Mike, and thanks for the review Bohuslav. :)