Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256
--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2009-03-24 11:03:41 EDT --- Ok on the docs, names and ldconfig.
Re: the license, I thought if using a GPLed library, the GPL version of the code must be >= the GPL version of the library? Or so I have that wrong? Or do the +s moot the whole thing?
Re: the patches, so essentially these allow us to work around an upstream limitation that upstream will be fixing in another manner?