https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1908038
--- Comment #9 from Jerry James loganjerry@gmail.com --- Oh, I forgot to mention that the fedora-review complaint is because both the main package and the javadoc package contain the license file. Since neither depends on the other, this is necessary. The contents of the file are exactly the same in both cases, so this is okay from an RPM standpoint.