Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577152
Chen Lei supercyper1@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #16 from Chen Lei supercyper1@gmail.com 2010-06-20 07:46:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14)
(In reply to comment #13)
Group for apoextractor should be Group: System Environment/Libraries, Development/Libraries is for -devel only.
I'll change that, thanks. By the way, do you know of any Fedora guidelines for choosing RPM groups? I guess there are none, since RPM groups are pretty much obsoleted by comps.
NO guideline as I known, but comps can not replace rpm group because most libraries are not registerd in comps.
I noticed apiextractor rpm for opensuse patched the place of cmake modules from %{_libdir}/cmake/ApiExtractor-%{version}/ to %{_libdir}/cmake/ApiExtractor, I' not sure if it's needed.
No idea why they would want to do that. CMake searches both directories for module configuration files, so there is really no advantage using one over other. Do you have a link to that opensuse package?
No difference between the two places for cmake modules I think, but we still need a convention to treat cmake modules.
See http://www.pyside.org/downloads/
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/cgoncalves:/pyside:/