https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2136778
Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(mhroncok@redhat.c | |om) |
--- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok mhroncok@redhat.com --- No, the packager does not need to repeat the %license thing if the license file is already part of --licensefiles.
There is no rule nor recommendation to have licenses in /usr/share/licenses/, the only rule is to make them with %license and %pyproject_save_files already does that, if upstream has the correct metadata.
See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_example_s... and look up %license.
My comment for the Root License Directory patch does say that files marked as License-File in upstream metadata are marked as %license in the file list. It does not say that you should duplicate the %license entry at all.